Day: June 8, 2005

  • Jihadis in Our Midst

    Two terror suspects arrested in California

    The FBI has arrested two California men after one of them admitted he attended an al Qaeda training camp in Pakistan, Justice Department officials said on Wednesday.

    Hamid Hayat, 23, and his father, Umer, of Lodi, California, east of San Francisco, were taken into custody over the weekend. Both men are being held on charges of lying to federal authorities.

    Two other men were arrested in Lodi for violating terms of their visas, said Immigration and Customs Enforcement spokesman Dean Boyd.

    The men have been identified as Muhammad Adil Khan — an imam at Farooqia Islamic Center — and Shabbir Ahmed, who is also an imam in Lodi, an administration source said.

    According to an FBI affidavit, Hamid Hayat told agents he attended al Qaeda training camps in Pakistan in 2003 and 2004.

    “Hamid advised that he specifically requested to come to the United States to carry out his jihad mission,” according to the affidavit. “Potential targets for attack would include hospitals and large food stores.”

    Hamid Hayat told agents the camp provided paramilitary training, including training in explosives and hand-to-hand combat, the affidavit said. During weapons training, photos of high-ranking U.S. political figures, including President Bush, were pasted onto targets, according to the affidavit.

    “Hamid further stated that he and others at the camp were being trained on how to kill Americans,” the affidavit said.

    Hamid, whose U.S.-bound flight from Korea was diverted on May 29 to Japan because his name appeared on a no-fly list, had originally denied any involvement in terrorism.

    After the plane was diverted, Hamid was interviewed by an FBI agent, the affidavit said. Hamid denied having any connection to terrorism or terrorist activities and was allowed to continue his travel to the United States, it said.

    Upon his arrival in California, Hamid again denied being involved in training camps.

    One day later, after taking a lie detector test, Hamid admitted that he had attended an al Qaeda training camp, the affidavit said.

    Hamid’s father, Umer, had originally denied that his son was involved in terrorist training camps and had said he knew of no such camps in Pakistan.

    After he was shown a videotape of his son admitting that he trained at the camp, Umer said he had visited the camps and had paid for Hamid’s flight to Pakistan to attend the training camp.

    Looks like a pretty open-and-shut case. I’d like to suggest we drain all the information from them that we can, provide them with due process, try ’em and fry ’em.

    Dr. Rusty Shackleford at the Jawa Report is all over the story with his own views, a variety of news sources and updates, and a round-up of postings from all around the blogosphere.

    Flag-rippers part of New York jihadist group

    The video that I posted below of American Muslims stomping on and then ripping up an American flag comes from a New York-based Muslim group called the Islamic Thinkers Society.

    I personally feel that desecration of our flag by my fellow Americans to be disgusting but certainly within their rights. The video is disturbing, not only in the treatment of the flag but also in the twisted, often non-sensical shoutings of the perpetrators. The group seems immature, begging not so much for support as for attention. It is such cult-like but childish behaviour that points to future dangers from others of like mind but stronger conviction.

    The Swanky Conservative also has the video, along with screen captures and commentary, on his cleverly-titled post “Don’t question their patriotism.”

    Islamists on the Left Coast. Islamists on the Right Coast. I say again that it is only a matter of time before the reality of this conflict hits the landscape of our nation again. The fight must be continued.

  • Bush Resists Carter Call to Shut Gitmo

    Former President Jimmy Carter has once again felt obligated to thrust himself onto the international stage by foolishly calling for the closure of the detention center at Guantanamo. He means well, I think. President Bush has been diplomatic in his response.

    US President George Bush left open yesterday the possibility of closing the Guantánamo Bay prison, a day after his White House predecessor Jimmy Carter called for it to be shut.

    “We’re exploring all alternatives as to how best to do the main objective, which is to protect America,” Mr Bush said when asked in an interview on Fox television if he would close the detention centre.

    He added, however, that comparisons between Guantánamo and the Soviet gulag were “just absurd”. Mr Carter had told a conference in Atlanta that the prison should be shut to demonstrate the US commitment to human rights.

    “Despite President George W Bush’s bold reminder that America is determined to promote freedom and democracy around the world, the US continues to suffer terrible embarrassment and a blow to our reputation as a champion of human rights because of reports concerning abuses of prisoners in Iraq, Afghanistan and Guantánamo,” he said.

    In addition to closing Guantánamo Bay and two dozen other detention facilities, Mr Carter said, the US needed to make sure all detainees were told the charges against them.

    Short answer for the former president: No. Now go be quietly supportive, or at least just quiet, like a good ex-president.

    On a related note, I’ve heard this book is a good read. I’ll have to give it a gander.

  • Military Records to Show How Luminaries Served

    Want to know the service record of yesteryear’s people of note? Want to look up the military performance of an ancestor? Well, here’s your chance.

    Psychedelic-guitar man Jimi Hendrix, soul singer Marvin Gaye, Desi “Ricky Ricardo” Arnaz and actor Steve McQueen, newsman Edward R. Murrow, “Dragnet” detective Jack Webb — military veterans all.

    Who knew?

    The nation now will be afforded some unique insight into these former servicemen and 144 other “persons of exceptional prominence” who served in the military.

    For the first time, their official service records will be opened to the public, the National Archives & Records Administration announced yesterday. The records of 1.2 million enlisted men and women who served in the U.S. Navy and Marine Corps from 1885 to 1935 also will be made public.

    The roster includes Elvis Presley and folk singer Barry Sadler, actors Clark Gable and Vic Morrow, pilots Eddie Rickenbacker and Charles Lindbergh, boxers Rocky Marciano and Joe Louis, plus baseball heroes Jackie Robinson, Roberto Clemente and Hank Greenberg.

    “These records are full of history, but they’re also very personal. They contain biographies, performance reports, duty assignments, nominations for medals,” said Barry McGraw, director of archival programs at the National Personnel Records Center (NPRC).

    Thankfully, some precautions for privacy are being maintained.

    “Public figures must have been deceased at least 10 years before we can release their records,” Mr. McGraw [, said. “For the general public, they must have been released from the service for at least 62 years.”

    Records of celebrated military and sports heroes and famous political names are up for grabs.

    […]

    The center has a few sensitivity protocols in place.

    “Sometimes there are personnel actions, records of inappropriate behavior, medical files and so forth which could embarrass a family,” Mr. McGraw said.

    “For an individual who would be less than 100 years of age, we can screen out those items,” he said. “If that person would have been over 100 years, then it’s all open to the public.”

    This could prove to be quite a boon to biographers, historians and geneologists.

  • The Subtle Tricks of al Jazeera

    Want to be an effective propaganda machine? There’s always the Big Lie. Blasting the audience with a repetition of a falsehood while eliminating or drowning out the truth will work, as was ably shown by Nazi Germany. There are alternative, more subtle means, though.

    One possible way is to pass yourself off as a legitimate news agency and then tweak the stories. Ah, the devil is always in the details.

    For your examination, I present al-Jazeera.

    Now, I’m not normally an al-Jazeera reader. Mrs. Greyhawk led me down this path in her latest Dawn Patrol post. In the link, al-Jazeera trumpets that the American media is turning against American efforts in Iraq.

    American media no longer accept Bushs war lies [sic]

    In the story, al-Jazeera lists a collection of American newspaper stories published on or near Memorial Day that decried the current situation in Iraq. Mostly, the article is accurate in its painting of the stories. However, a couple of subtle touches jumped out at me.

    The piece pointed to a column from June 2 by Steve Chapman of the Chicago Tribune. The original text reads as follows:

    The dilemma the U.S. faces in fighting the insurgents is that military methods are not enough to solve the problem and may make it worse. If the movement is a reaction to the U.S. military presence, keeping American troops in Iraq amounts to fighting a fire with kerosene.

    The al-Jazeera plays with it slightly:

    “The dilemma the U.S. faces in fighting the (anti-occupation fighters) is that military methods are not enough to solve the problem and may make it worse. If the movement is a reaction to the U.S. military presence, keeping American troops in Iraq amounts to fighting a fire with kerosene. …

    The edit there is obvious in comparison — “anti-occupation fighters” has been substituted for “insurgents” by al-Jazeera. Is this a minor detail? No, when one considers how al-Jazeera defines anti-occupation fighters. As this al-Jazeera poll page shows, the terrorist group Hezbollah is also classified as an anti-occupation movement. Yes, the same Hezbollah that supports the occupation of Lebanon by Syria and bloodily opposes the occupation of Israel by, well, Israel.

    At least that change used a parenthetical notation to demonstrate an al-Jazeera edit. Now, for a more subtle tweak.

    We then turn to what al-Jazeera introduces as “the most powerful denunciation … from an unlikely source.” That is how a June 1 piece by the editorial board of the Seattle Post-Intelligencer is, admittedly fairly accurately, framed. The original opens with the following:

    President Bush was among the 260,000 graves at Arlington National Cemetery when he said it. But it was clear Monday that the president was referring to the more than 1,650 Americans killed to date in Iraq when he said, “We must honor them by completing the mission for which they gave their lives; by defeating the terrorists.”

    Here is the supposed same piece from al-Jazeera:

    “President Bush was among the 260,000 graves at Arlington National Cemetery when he said it. But it was clear Monday that the president was referring to the more than 1,650 Americans killed to date in Iraq when he said, ‘We must honour them by completing the mission for which they gave their lives; by defeating the “terrorists”.’

    Note the difference? Without any journalistic acknowledgment of the edit, al-Jazeera inserted quote marks around the word “terrorists.” The reader is left to believe one of two things — either the original piece included the doubting quote marks or President Bush held up his two hands and gave the internationally-annoying insert-quote-marks hand gesture while speaking. The latter being obviously unlikey, al-Jazeera has managed to add even greater spin to the original piece.

    I have utter faith in the ability of our mainstream media to grab hold of defeat from the jaws of victory and hold onto it tenaciously, given the opportunity. They’ve managed it before. If they are willing to let an opposing propaganda machine use them yet again, then that is one thing, disgusting though it may be. If they are willing to let the enemy play them in violation of the media’s own standards of journalism, well, then that is another. That is a media betraying its own country’s military efforts, their own progeny’s security and their very own professional integrity. What does that leave, people?

    Nothing but a mindset.

    My guess — the “American” mainstream media will continue to let such issues slide, and the al-Jazeera propaganda machine, which could be answered globally by an integrated effort, will continue to roll on and be painted as a “legitimate” alternative media source. Sometimes, really all too often, my life-long love of journalism is sickened by the modern state of the craft.