{"id":1139,"date":"2005-10-27T22:55:28","date_gmt":"2005-10-28T03:55:28","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/targetcentermass.net\/?p=1139"},"modified":"2005-10-27T23:00:29","modified_gmt":"2005-10-28T04:00:29","slug":"house-easily-votes-to-allow-base-closings","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/targetcentermass.net\/?p=1139","title":{"rendered":"House Easily Votes to Allow Base Closings"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I personally find today&#8217;s <a href=\"http:\/\/seattlepi.nwsource.com\/national\/1152AP_Base_Closings.html\">base closure vote<\/a> to be very good news.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>The House voted overwhelmingly Thursday to allow the first round of U.S. military base closures and consolidations in a decade, clearing the way for facilities across the country to start shutting their doors as early as next month.<\/p>\n<p>In a 324-85 vote, the House refused to veto the final report of the 2005 base-closing commission, meaning the report seems all but certain to become law in mid-November. Targeted facilities then would have six years to close their doors and shift forces as required under the report.<\/p>\n<p>Both the House and Senate must pass resolutions rejecting the report to stop the Pentagon&#8217;s sweeping restructuring of its far-flung domestic base network. But, as expected, the House effort by Rep. Ray LaHood, R-Ill., failed. And there&#8217;s no similar attempt under way in the Senate.<\/p>\n<p>Opposition to closing bases dropped steadily in both chambers as the nine-member commission changed parts of Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld&#8217;s original recommendations and issues like Hurricanes Katrina and Rita commanded Congress&#8217; attention.<\/p>\n<p>The panel sent President Bush its final report in September. He signed off on it and sent it to Congress on Sept. 15. That began a 45-legislative day period for Congress to reject the report.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>I entirely understand the need for legal constraints upon the nation&#8217;s military, and that it is best for the republic that our armed forces be answerable to and be held accountable by our civilian political leadership.  However, I find it disgusting that this so often leads to local or petty politics coming into play in the administration of our military, all too commonly in a manner that is contrary to what is actually best for the military and our nation&#8217;s defenses.  This story contains a fine example.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Congressional critics and many local officials fear the impact of base closures on their area economies &#8211; and on their political futures. They argue that the United States should not restructure military bases while the U.S. military is engaged in Iraq and Afghanistan.<\/p>\n<p>LaHood, whose district includes a base in Springfield, Ill., that is to lose 15 National Guard fighter jets, urged his colleagues to vote to reject the report &#8220;in support of those that are citizen soldiers who come from those communities.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Closing bases during wartime, he said, &#8220;is the wrong message to send.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>This round of base closures, better described as a DoD restructuring, does not call for a reduction in strength or capability.  Instead, it is intended to move us further from a Cold War footing and to reduce unneeded expenditures.  Troop levels and lethality are not being cut whatso-freakin&#8217;-ever.  Does the congressman actually believe that our radical Islamist enemies will take one ounce of encouragement from the removal of 15 jets from Springfield, Land o&#8217; Lincoln version?!!<\/p>\n<p>Luckily, this kind of tripe was not allowed to stand.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>But Rep. Duncan Hunter, R-Calif., chairman of the House Armed Services Committee, who supports closing bases, said: &#8220;these issues have been thoroughly discussed and debated.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>The Pentagon, the White House and GOP congressional leaders &#8211; and even many Democrats &#8211; contend that eliminating extra space will free up money that could be used instead to improve the United States&#8217; fighting capabilities, and help reposition U.S. forces to face current and future threats.<\/p>\n<p>In a statement, the Bush administration said that halting the round of base closings now &#8220;would harm U.S. national security interests by preventing improvements designed to address the new demands of war against extremists and other 21st century needs.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Overall, the report calls for closing 22 major military bases and reconfiguring an additional 33. Hundreds of smaller facilities from coast to coast also will close, shrink or grow, under a plan that the commission says will mean annual savings of $4.2 billion.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Since the post-Cold War &#8220;peace dividend,&#8221; an idea perhaps too eagerly latched onto and prematurely dismissive of other growing global threats, became a rallying cry in the early &#8217;90s, politics have weighed far too heavily in the base-closure process.  The Pentagon did not get its way entirely this round, but it looks like this may be the closest we&#8217;ve come to actual defense benefit carrying the day. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I personally find today&#8217;s base closure vote to be very good news. The House voted overwhelmingly Thursday to allow the first round of U.S. military base closures and consolidations in a decade, clearing the way for facilities across the country to start shutting their doors as early as next month. In a 324-85 vote, the [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2,4],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1139","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-military","category-politics"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/targetcentermass.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1139","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/targetcentermass.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/targetcentermass.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/targetcentermass.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/targetcentermass.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1139"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/targetcentermass.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1139\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/targetcentermass.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1139"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/targetcentermass.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1139"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/targetcentermass.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1139"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}