{"id":1206,"date":"2005-11-27T00:15:05","date_gmt":"2005-11-27T06:15:05","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/targetcentermass.net\/?p=1206"},"modified":"2005-11-27T00:15:19","modified_gmt":"2005-11-27T06:15:19","slug":"india-calls-for-scrutiny-of-aq-khan-network","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/targetcentermass.net\/?p=1206","title":{"rendered":"India calls for scrutiny of AQ Khan network"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Not a bad idea <a href=\"http:\/\/www.dailytimes.com.pk\/default.asp?page=2005%5C11%5C27%5Cstory_27-11-2005_pg7_36\">here<\/a>, but perhaps it&#8217;s more of a case of proposing shutting the barn door after the animals have taken to the hills.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>India has demanded a scrutiny of the &#8220;Pakistan-based AQ Khan network&#8221; for greater transparency in non-proliferation.<\/p>\n<p>In his statement at the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) on Saturday, India&#8217;s permanent representative Dr Sheel Kant Sharma called for &#8220;greater clarity&#8221; regarding clandestine proliferation activities. He singled out the AQ Khan nuclear proliferation network, saying that Pakistan needed to shed greater light on its activities.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Greater clarity and transparency in this area will serve the objectives of non-proliferation, to which we are all committed,&#8221; the Indian representative said. &#8220;This would also enhance the IAEA&#8217;s credibility.&#8221; India also expressed &#8220;happiness and relief&#8221; that Iran&#8217;s controversial nuclear programme was not put to a vote for referral to the UN Security Council at the IAEA meeting. &#8220;We are extremely happy and relieved that there was no vote,&#8221; a senior Indian official said. The meeting of the IAEA Board of Governors \u00e2\u20ac\u201d of which India is a member \u00e2\u20ac\u201d even refrained from passing a fresh resolution on Iran&#8217;s nuclear programme. Iran claims that its programme is for peaceful purposes, but the US and Europe suspect that it is aimed at building nuclear weapons.<\/p>\n<p>At the nuclear watchdog&#8217;s last meeting in September, India had surprisingly sided with the West on a resolution criticising Iran&#8217;s nuclear activities and threatening referral to the UN Security Council. India&#8217;s vote had caused an uproar in the country, with both government allies and opposition criticising it. The left-wing parties, whose 60 seats in parliament provide crucial support to the ruling United Progressive Alliance (UPA), had vowed to oppose a fresh Indian vote against Iran.<\/p>\n<p>External Affairs Ministry officials claimed that the outcome was the result of a diplomatic campaign launched by India with some other countries, including the US, several European nations, Russia and China. &#8220;It has kept the door open for resolving the issue between Iran and the EU-3 through negotiations,&#8221; a Foreign Ministry official said.<\/p>\n<p>Indian officials said that the West had the numbers on the 35-member IAEA board to refer the issue to the Security Council, but the &#8220;divisive&#8221; move would have created fresh tensions in the already-volatile region.<\/p>\n<p>Negotiations between the EU-3 \u00e2\u20ac\u201d Britain, France and Germany \u00e2\u20ac\u201d and Iran are scheduled to begin early next month. All key players are now discussing a proposal that allows Iran&#8217;s enrichment programme to be outsourced to Russia. Tehran has so far opposed this. &#8220;Every country has a public position on the issue. However, it remains to be seen how willing they are to be flexible to find a solution,&#8221; the Indian official said.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>And, just because I can:  <a href=\"http:\/\/khaaan.com\/\">Khan!!!<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Not a bad idea here, but perhaps it&#8217;s more of a case of proposing shutting the barn door after the animals have taken to the hills. India has demanded a scrutiny of the &#8220;Pakistan-based AQ Khan network&#8221; for greater transparency in non-proliferation. In his statement at the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) on Saturday, India&#8217;s [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[25],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1206","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-central-asia"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/targetcentermass.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1206","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/targetcentermass.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/targetcentermass.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/targetcentermass.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/targetcentermass.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1206"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/targetcentermass.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1206\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/targetcentermass.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1206"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/targetcentermass.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1206"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/targetcentermass.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1206"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}