We have tried since the birth of our nation to promote our love of peace by a display of weakness. This course has failed us utterly.
—General George Marshall
We have tried since the birth of our nation to promote our love of peace by a display of weakness. This course has failed us utterly.
—General George Marshall
Well, the fiancee and I have narrowed it down to an April/May date and one of two locations. Anybody want to chime in on either of the following places?
We hope to have some details set in stone by the end of the weekend.
Expect this to be the first in a series of fruitless searches for assistance against indecisiveness until the deed is done.
Really, after five years of dating, I expected to be handed an itinerary, probably in MS Project, immediately after proposing.
Well, here’s an intriguing kidnapping tale.
The kidnappers of the 37-year-old daughter of a Dutch millionaire who was freed unharmed had demanded a ranson of 300kg of cocaine, authorities said on Thursday.
The kidnappers, who according to the victim appeared to be two Latin Americans and one African, are still at large.
Claudia Melchers was freed by her abductors early on Thursday, Amsterdam’s police commissioner, Willem Woelders, said.
“I do not know why she was freed and she does not know either. I do not know if the ranson or another form of ransom was paid,” said Woelders, admitting there were still a lot of unanswered questions in the investigation.
The police commissioner also said the ransom demand, which was written in English, was in a letter discovered after the kidnapping in Melchers’s apartment, located in an upmarket Amsterdam neighbourhood.
Such a demand certainly would have been an interesting plot twist in Mel Gibson’s Ransom. I can see it now.
The whole world now knows … my son, Sean Mullen, was kidnapped, for ransom, three days ago. This is a recent photograph of him. Sean, if you’re watching, we love you. And this … well, this is what waits for the man that took him. This is your ransom. Three hundred kilograms Columbian in uncut blocks, just like you wanted. But this is as close as you’ll ever get to it. You’ll never snort one line of this cocaine, because no ransom will ever be paid for my son. Not one key, not one gram. Instead, I’m offering this nose candy as a reward on your head. Dead or alive, it doesn’t matter. So congratulations, you’ve just become a three hundred kilograms lottery ticket … except the odds are much, much better. Do you know anyone that wouldn’t turn you in for three hundred kilograms? I don’t think you do. I doubt it. So wherever you go and whatever you do, this blow will be tracking you down for all time. And to ensure that it does, to keep interest alive, I’m running a full-page ad in every major newspaper every Sunday … for as long as it takes. But … and this is your last chance … you return my son, alive, uninjured, I’ll withdraw the bounty. With any luck you can simply disappear. Understand … you will never see this coke. Not one sniff. So you still have a chance to do the right thing. If you don’t, well, then, God be with you, because nobody else on this Earth will be.
The 2005 edition of National Talk Like a Pirate Day is just around the corner on September 19.
First, a very solid column about how the Palestinians in the Gaza Strip and much of the West Bank have an unprecedented opportunity — control of their own destiny.
Now, it’s the Palestinians’ turn
But now, after the last Israeli has come home, the disengagement has ceased to be an Israeli event. Now, after the gate of the Kissufim checkpoint has been locked, the disengagement has become a Palestinian event. The exclamation point that Ariel Sharon placed at the gates of Gaza has been replaced by an unprecedented Palestinian question mark. The Israeli withdrawal vacated an arena in which a fateful Palestinian drama is about to be played out.
The Palestinians are trying to blur this decisive fact. They are behaving as if nothing has happened. They continue to use the old, anachronistic rhetoric that has become so nauseatingly familiar. They continue to claim that the Israeli withdrawal is incomplete and insufficient. They continue to declare that the struggle will continue until every bit of Palestinian land has been liberated. And even worse: by torching the synagogues and storming the Philadelphi route, they are signaling that they do not intend to behave as a responsible state.
[…]
Freedom creates obligations – even when it is only partial. Now, when the Palestinians have been given freedom such as they have never known before, they also bear responsibility such as they have never known before. Their relationship with Israel is changing. It is no longer just that of occupier and occupied. It is no longer just that of master and servant. That is why the spotlight of history is now focused on those very Palestinians who have begun to be masters of their own fate. That is why all eyes are now fixed on liberated Gaza. Because now, the decisive question is what the Palestinians’ choice will be.
Go give it a gander. It’s certainly true that the onus has been squarely placed upon Palestinian society, and it’s certainly true that I have little faith in that being a good thing, at least until major reforms are in place and allowed to take root over a couple of decades. Unfortunately, I have yet to see serious signs of those reforms even beginning.
Speaking of beginnings, de-occupied Gaza is certainly off to a shaky start.
Palestinians’ pullout celebration ends in disorder
Gunmen firing in the air disrupted a Palestinian Authority rally celebrating Israel’s pullout from Gaza and the gathering ended in chaos on Wednesday when traditional Muslims stoned the stage in protest.
Abbas, struggling to impose order to win backing for Palestinian statehood, cancelled plans to address the rally, reflecting concern about militant rivals within his fractured Fatah movement and opposition Islamists led by Hamas.
A speech by an Abbas aide calling for an end to armed chaos was marred by Fatah gunmen parading across the stage and firing assault rifles in the air. This prompted Hamas activists to walk out from what had been billed as a show of Palestinian unity.
The rally ended in disorder when devoutly Muslim refugees dominating the crowd of several thousand stoned the stage in protest at a rap music band’s failure to stick to nationalist songs. The performers fled, gunmen firing over their heads.
Palestinian security forces took charge in abandoned Jewish settlements earlier in the day, ending looting and destruction following Monday’s withdrawal. But the messy rally suggested they had a way to go to rein in lawlessness.
It’s not a good sign for the rule of law when a government’s staged rally cannot even be controlled. Sure, the madness and looting was stopped at the empty settlements but, after two days of banditry, I expect satiation and exhaustion had as much a role in the cessation as did security forces.
Meanwhile, hopes for an outbreak of peace upon Israeli withdrawal, hopes which I never held, took a hit from an Egyptian revelation.
Arms cache found in 4km Gaza tunnel
Egyptian security forces have discovered a tunnel filled with weapons underneath the border with the Gaza Strip.
The arms cache was found just days after Israeli troops pulled out of the border zone.
An Egyptian official says dozens of machine guns and 2,800 rocket-propelled grenades were found inside the tunnel.
Stretching four kilometres under the Egypt-Gaza border, the tunnel was discovered by newly deployed Egyptian soldiers.
News flash: those weapons were not headed to the supposedly-ruling Palestinian Authority, nor were they intended to promote peaceful stability. The Israelis are the obvious targets, but the P.A. may soon also find itself on the wrong end of other smuggled weaponry.
The political fallout in Iraq from the Tal Afar offensive, now wrapping up, is just beginning. The issue remains as to whether the questioning will carry any weight with a populace growing sick of terror in its midst.
Sunni Arab leaders in Iraq are criticizing the Iraqi government’s three day-old military operation against Sunni insurgents and foreign fighters in the northern Iraqi city of Tal Afar.
Since the military operation in the predominantly Sunni city of Tal Afar began on Saturday, the government has been reassuring the Iraqi public that the offensive, near the Syrian border, was launched only after residents there begged the government to rid Tal Afar of Iraqi Sunni extremists and foreign fighters, who had turned the city into a terrorist haven.
Still, several prominent Sunni Arab groups and leaders on Tuesday said that they deplored the use of force in Tal Afar.
Contrary to the beliefs of some, terrorists do not respond positively to group hugs.
Former interim Iraqi Interior Minister Falah al-Naqib criticized what he said was the government’s failure to seek a political dialogue with Sunni leaders in Tal Afar before opting for a military solution.
“Definitely, there should have been a better solution than a major military operation,†he said. “I don’t encourage any military operations against civilians. I’ve been told that there are quite a number of innocent people being killed during this operation. I’ve been told that the humanitarian situation is very bad in Tal Afar.”
Yeah? Well, I’ve been told of 10K dead in N’awlins. First reports have a tendency towards exaggeration, but that obvious truth holds little value when political interests are at stake. The Iraqi government must immediately and persuasively address any such issues in the local rumor mill.
Iraq’s Shi’ite-dominated interim government says those reports are not true. It insists most residents had already fled Tal Afar before the offensive began and those who remained were evacuated and given tents, food, water and medical care. Iraqi leaders add that millions of dollars have been put aside to fund the rebuilding of the city.
The government says that all Iraqis should be proud of the Tal Afar operation because it marked the first time that U.S.-trained Iraqi security forces had taken the lead in a major military sweep. Eleven battalions of the Iraqi army, three battalions of Iraqi police force and one special police commando unit are said to have taken part in the fight in Tal Afar, with a much smaller number of U.S. troops providing back-up support.
Here’s the true story of the Tal Afar campaign — Iraqi forces overwhelmingly carried the water. This is the first step towards an actually viable and sustainable self-determination for the peoples of Iraq.
Meanwhile, as Tal Afar winds down for now, Chad at In the Bullpen talks of a new sweep in the town of Haditha and includes some of the disgusting, though not unbelievable, tactics of our terrorist enemies.
War without allies is bad enough, with allies it is hell!
—Marshal of the RAF Sir John C. Slessor
And today we have another reminder of the veracity of Sir John’s statement.
Germany, France, Britain and other European countries said Tuesday that they strongly opposed an American plan for NATO to become involved in counterinsurgency operations in Afghanistan.
Meeting with NATO defense ministers here at the start of a two-day conference, the U.S. defense secretary, Donald Rumsfeld, said he would urge the military alliance to expand its role beyond security and peacekeeping and consider joining combat operations against the Taliban-led insurgency.
Although Rumsfeld emphasized that the 20,000 American troops would continue to handle the counterinsurgency mission “for a time,” he said NATO should consider deploying troops to Afghanistan’s eastern border region, where much of the fighting is occurring.
He added, “Over time, it would be nice if NATO developed counterterrorism capabilities, which don’t exist at the present time.”
Well, now would certainly seem an opportune time for NATO to begin building cooperative counterterrorism units and methodologies, and Afghanistan certainly seems the best available testing ground. That is, unless we’re still clutching the fear that the Red Horde is going to come storming through the Fulda Gap.
The Pentagon would like to draw down the presence of American troops, who have come under increasing attack from insurgents since the spring.
Germany’s defense minister, Peter Struck, said on German radio and television that merging NATO’s peacekeeping mission with the American combat operation would fundamentally change NATO’s role in Afghanistan and “would make the situation for our soldiers doubly dangerous and worsen the current climate in Afghanistan.”
Yes, Mr. Struck, putting troops into combat would increase the danger that they face, but thank you, sir, as it’s truly crucial that the obvious be stated costumed as enlightening. Now, if only you would elaborate on how sharing a role in a mission already taking place would change Afghanistan’s climate, then maybe you would actually be saying something of value.
Britain, too, is reluctant to merge the two missions. John Reid, the British defense secretary, supported a “synergy” in which the missions would complement each other. A British defense official said the real issue was “about NATO’s long-term role and how it can adapt to the needs of the 21st century and the new threats.”
France, which has special forces soldiers working alongside U.S. troops in Afghanistan, said Tuesday that it opposed merging the two missions.
A French Defense Ministry official, who like the British official insisted on anonymity because of the delicacy of the discussions, said “the two missions were completely different.”
He added: “If you suddenly merge special forces or heavy counterterrorism units with stabilizing forces, which is NATO’s role in Afghanistan, then you completely undermine NATO’s role.”
One issue with both the British and French statement’s here — a merger of the two missions is not actually being proposed with the exception of the very top level of command, as we’ll soon see. The mingling of stabilization and counterterror forces is not being proposed.
NATO took command of the International Security Assistance Force in August 2003, the first time that the U.S.-led military alliance took on a mission away from its traditional base of Europe. Its primary role has been to maintain security, expand the authority of President Hamid Karzai of Afghanistan outside the capital of Kabul and assist in the reconstruction of the country.
Meanwhile, American troops have maintained a separate operation with 20,000 troops aimed mainly at defeating Al Qaeda and Taliban insurgents, chiefly in the south and east of the country.
With NATO’s mandate scheduled to expire next spring, American officials are urging the alliance to expand its role, in part because of the urge to reduce the U.S. troop presence.
At least initially, Rumsfeld told reporters traveling with him, NATO would not replace American troops in a combat role, but handle security and other noncombat duties, as it does elsewhere in the country. Then he added that he hoped NATO would develop counterterrorism capabilities similar to the Americans’.
A senior Defense Department official declined to provide the Americans’ preferred timetable for NATO to take over the Afghan operation. But this week’s meetings in Berlin are aimed at overcoming resistance about taking on a combat role in Afghanistan.
American military officials say they envision a joint NATO command structure in which countries willing to contribute troops to the counterinsurgency mission would be under one commander, while allies that prefer to continue to conduct peacekeeping and other noncombat roles would fall under a separate officer.
This is not allies expressing differences; rather, this is mere quibbling to cover a fear of potentially entering counterterror operations. While one could argue that a unified command structure in the theater simply makes sense in the coordination of efforts, I would be quite willing for the U.S. to give in this area. However, I think the true issue is not this small protestation but rather the reluctance to actually play an offensive role in the Afghanistan arena.
Both operations would fall under a single NATO commander in charge of all operations in Afghanistan, the officials said.
Officials of several NATO countries said they assumed that the United States would want an American in that role.
Judging by the current political leadership of NATO countries, I certainly wouldn’t want a French or German in that role. As I said, I would be willing, albeit reluctantly as I feel it makes sense, give up the unified command concept. Also, I would happily accept a non-American commander take the reins, depending upon the commander and the political backing (read spine) of his countrymen.
German Defense Ministry officials said Struck’s comments had nothing to do with Germany’s federal election that takes place on Sunday. The radical Left Party of former East German Communists and former members of Chancellor Gerhard Schröder’s Social Democratic Party have called for the withdrawal of all German troops from Afghanistan and other countries. Germany has 1,816 soldiers in Afghanistan.
Struck’s position was clear. “NATO is not equipped for counterterrorism operations” he said. “That is not what it is supposed to do.”
No, counterterrorism was not the original envisionment of NATO. It was formed as a Cold War alliance, a counterweight to the threat from the Soviet Union and its satellites. Should the alliance continue to serve any purpose, however, it must recognize today’s actual threat — the radical Islamist expansionism that is clear to see around the globe. For the foreseeable future, that most assuredly exclusively means counterterrorism efforts, as the jihadists are not in a position to form up as a replacement to the Warsaw Pact forces. If the nations of NATO refuse to face this danger in its current state, I see little need for it to continue as a military alliance. It can be reformed in a number of decades out of the nations that haven’t rotted from within from their already troublesome pockets of Islamist immigrants when there actually is a horde to be faced at the border. Alas! I doubt that enemy will bring the rational behaviour that often seemed to keep the Soviets in check.
Welcome to the Carnival of Liberty XI: Freddy vs. Predator at Red Dawn (Wolverines!!!) of the Dead.
But first, a few preliminaries.
This carnival is primarily, though not exclusively, the work of the Life, Liberty, Property community, and I’d like to thank its founder, Eric, for the opportunity to host this week’s round-up.
Postings are listed in the order they were received, so don’t stop reading after the first few. That said, as host I have arbitrarily decided to designate a few personal favorites with the groovy tank from the classic Atari Combat game. Yeah, I loved my M-1, but Atari’s little beauty could guide its rounds back and forth via joystick (on some settings, that is). Do check out the other entries — personal tastes may vary.
Be sure to visit the concession stand for popcorn and soda. Now, away we go with Carnival of Liberty XI.
From T F Stern’s Rantings, Simple Reminder from a Wise Man. Mr. Stern looks back on the spirit felt throughout America after 9/11 and how that spirit and our liberties are under assault today.
A destructive wedge has been applied to our Union, one that attempts to silence our uniquely American Spirit, a Spirit that says, “We can do it; with the help of God, we can do anything!†There is an under current tearing at the foundation of Liberty. It has the appearance of being for the collective good of the group while destroying the Liberty of each individual in that group; in other words, it’s a lie.
From Fair Vote Watch, New Orleans, meet Naples ’44. Jarndyce contrasts the recent mayhem in New Orleans with 1944 Naples after the Allied invasion of Italy.
Lewis’s masterpiece, Naples ’44 does recount the breakdown of order after the Allied invasion of Italy: petty crime, prostitution, kleptomania, freebooting, black-marketeering. Survival, yes, but Lewis’s tale isn’t one about the end of civilisation
From The Sharpener, ID cards by stealth. Nosemonkey rants against the possibility of ID cards being forced upon the nations of the EU.
Apparently the reason some people are wary of the EU is that it “does not appear to give sufficient priority to offering practical solutions which make a difference to some of the issues of greatest concern†– namely EEEVIL TERRORISTS, organised crime and asylum seekers. Let’s ignore the fact that people have been wary of the concept of the EU since its inception, shall we? And while we’re at it ignore that the original concept was economic, not judicial… Done? Excellent! Now that we’ve constructed a false history we can make that fiction fit our arguments. Hurrah!
From Searchlight Crusade, Sites That Cover Specific Issues. Dan Melson provides a handy and lengthy list of sites that can be referenced by those looking for information in a variety of categories. Further, Dan hopes to enhance the list with help from readers.
This is intended as one of those resource posts, a list of which blogs and personal websites make a habit of covering certain issues, or a list of “Go To” blogs and websites for various issues.
From Below The Beltway, Santorum On Liberty. Doug looks at a schism between the likes of Republican Sen. Rick Santorum of Pennsylvania and the libertarian wing of Santorum’s own party. Doug turns the post into a series with follow-on pieces here and here.
Therefore, I found this post on Catallarchy about the ideas expressed in Santorum’s book It Takes A Family: Conservatism And The Common Good very interesting, especially in the comparison of Santorum’s book with Barry Goldwater’s ground-breaking Conscience Of A Conservative.
From Political Calculations, Is Economic Freedom the Key to Peace? Ironman adds his emphasis to the findings of a recently-released study.
The Canadian-based Fraser Institute has released its Economic Freedom of the World 2005 Annual Report (available online as a 1.96MB PDF document). The report was primarily written by James Gwartney and Robert Lawson (of Division of Labour fame), but the most remarkable findings of the report were contributed by Columbia University political scientist Erik Gartzke, who found that economic freedom is an extremely important contributor to promoting peace between nations!
From Critical Mastiff, Are Progressive Taxes a Good Thing? While many opposed to the system of progressive taxation from the angles of reduced incentive on the individual or unequal treatment of supposedly equal citizens, Mastiff examines the issue from the ramifications on government behavior.
Now, at some level the government’s policies are constrained by the need to increase tax revenue—perhaps even to maximize revenue. Therefore, the government will more readily pursue policies that will generate more taxes than those generating fewer, let alone those policies decreasing tax revenues. (That this theory only works if our congressmen understand basic economics is, of course, its gaping flaw. But regardless.)
In our present fiscal situation, wealthy people and corporations pay high Federal income taxes, and poorer people pay no income taxes at all or very few. Therefore, it makes sense for our rational actor, the Federal Government, to make laws that give preference to the rich and corporations over the poor, since tax revenues respond much more quickly when the rich get richer than when the poor get less poor.
From Fearless Philosophy for Free Minds, Yes, I’m Angry About Gas Prices Too. Stephen Littau feels the pinch at the pump but points his anger in a less-than-common direction.
Unlike so many Americans however, my anger is directed mostly at the environmental extremist greenie-weenies, the politicians who pander to them, an American public that is largely economically illiterate, and the politicians/interest groups who exploit this illiteracy.
From Resistance is futile!, Our Future. Oregon’s dark-horse gubernatorial candidate sits down with a couple of bloggers.
Why us?
Because Atkinson is running a different kind of campaign. He is reaching out to alternative media and reaching out to the many concerned voters who feel disenfranchised by the status quo.
[…]
So what did the three of us get out of this meeting?
Well, in a nutshell, I gained confidence that Jason Atkinson is the right man to run Oregon.
From Publicola, the related Homes and That Ain’t Right. Publicola examines the consequences of forced evacuations from Katrina-ravaged N’awlins.
“As flood waters receded inch by inch Tuesday, New Orleans Mayor C. Ray Nagin authorized law enforcement officers and the U.S. military to force the evacuation of all residents who refuse to heed orders to leave the dark, dangerous city.”
I have serious misgivings about the idea of the government forcing someone from their home. That’s not taking into account the method they will likely use. Government has two methods to act – force or threat of force. Neither one is appealing in this situation.
From The Pubcrawler, Iceland and Estonia. TKC looks at the success blooming in two European nations stemming from economic freedoms and ponders the lessons to be learned.
I wonder how long it will take America to answer the clue phone on this? Our toying with socialism is dragging us down. There is a choice to be made. Do we want the failure of the European model and its corresponding bleak outlook and suffering or do we want to return to our free-market roots and thrive like Estonia and Iceland.
FromWILLisms.com, Quotational Therapy: Part 43 — Huey P. Long, Socialist. Will Franklin looks at the roots of Louisiana’s political scene that has been pushed into the spotlight of late.
Many of Louisiana’s problems today are rooted in its long-term one-party rule. The notoriously corrupt Louisiana political machine has waned quite a bit over the past several decades, but it still lingers, particularly within New Orleans. We can look back to infamous Louisiana Governor (and Senator) Huey Long for insight into Louisiana’s political culture
From Satire, French President Chirac To Deliver “Vive La Louisiane Libre” Speech From Hospital Balcony. Self-named Mr. Satire uses the N’awlins situation to take a shot at Jacques.
French President Jacques Chirac has been admitted to a military hospital. The hospital said that the president is being treated for “lack of vision, diarrhea of brain and fracture of a spine.”
From The Unrepentant Individual, On Constitutional Interpretation. Brad examines the ramifications of drifting from the written word of the U.S. Constitution.
The overarching power in America is the Rule of Law. It is a blueprint, the first of its kind, that declares the terms of the social contract between individual and government. It is a simple, short, and powerful document, which can be understood by any adult with an eighth-grade education. And if it needs to change with changing times, there is an amendment process by which this can be accomplished.
So why have we messed it up so badly?
From NYgirl, A Crisis They Cried. NYGirl, a very welcome Carnival of Liberty newcomer, takes a critical look at the downside of foreign aid in Niger.
But, is aid the answer? The flood of foreign aid creates economic problems by driving down the price of locally produced grain & produce, forcing farmers who might otherwise be self sufficient into poverty. It also leads to the governments of the recipient countries to become less reform oriented as they lose the incentive to do so.
Ironically, it may even cause hunger, as has happened in some villages where the men have locked up the surplus grain & forbidden its consumption by their wives & children in order to receive aid. These men have an excellent understanding of the workings of aid agencies & are happy to exploit them. The women & children of Niger are paying the price.
From ROFASix, Rebuilding New Orleans. NOTR considers the idea of rebuilding N’awlins, not with its problematic past but with a blank slate.
We have a chance to do something different in rebuilding New Orleans. If government falls back into the same old rut of handing out money it is doomed to return to what it was before Katrina hit, the most corrupt city in America.
From TMH’s Bacon Bits, Remembering and Grieving …and a Warning. Bergbikr looks back on 9/11 and warns of lessons learned since.
The past few years have seen Jihadist attacks occur around the globe. Some are targeted at centers of Western civilization from which emanate our philosophy of individual worth and personal freedom and religious tolerance, principles that are anathema to those of the Death Culture. Muslims too are not spared the sword or the suicide bomber when they cooperate with the West or themselves deviate from the extreme readings of the Quran by this medieval set of thugs.
From Eric’s Grumbles Before the Grave, Liberty Is The Right Policy. Using Katrina as a lens, Eric examines the fundamental problem of knee-jerk, freedom-restricting responses to crises.
Why is it that the first instinct of the majority of our politicians when there is a problem of some sort is to restrict people’s freedoms and liberties? Even more importantly, why is the instinct of the majority of the citizens to go along with such an idea? Especially considering that time after time the end results don’t come out the way people think they will.
Well, that wraps up the Carnival. Maybe. As needed, I’ll add late submissions up until I feel it’s time to hand over the reigns to next week’s host, Sunni Maravillosa. A final thanks to all contributors; I’ve enjoyed reading your work. I will attempt to send a well-deserved trackback from this post to all of you but Alas! I have yet to successfully manage the feat, try as I may.
Target Centermass will be hosting the next installment of the Life, Liberty, Property community‘s Carnival of Liberty tomorrow.
Information of submitting entries can be found here.
[Originally posted on Sept. 11, 2004]
I also prefer to remember this, my alma mater’s first home game post-9/11. The color-coordinated shirts were the idea and hard work of a small handful of students. Thousands of dollars were raised for victims’ charities.

(image from the Houston Chronicle)