Author: Gunner

  • Quote of the Week, 17 APR 05

    Well, we did not build those bombers to carry crushed rose petals.

    —General Thomas S. Power

  • Iraq Kidnap Reports May Be Exaggerated

    Stories of mass kidnappings in a small, divided Iraqi town flew through the media Saturday. Now, one day later, it looks as if reports of huge numbers of hostages among the residents of Madain were overblown, if not almost entirely fictional.

    Iraqi security forces backed by U.S. troops had the town of Madain surrounded Sunday after reports of Sunni militant kidnappings of as many as 100 Shiite residents, but there were growing indications the incident had been grossly exaggerated, perhaps an outgrowth of a tribal dispute or political maneuvering.

    The town of about 1,000 families, evenly divided between Shiites and Sunnis, sits about 15 miles south of the capital in what the U.S. military has called the “Triangle of Death” because it has become a roiling stronghold of the militant insurgency.

    An AP photographer and television cameraman who were in or near the town Sunday said large numbers of Iraqi forces had sealed it off, supported by U.S. forces farther away outside Madain.

    The cameraman said he toured the town Sunday morning. People were going about their business normally, shops were open and tea houses were full, he said. Residents contacted by telephone also said everything was normal in Madain.

    And American military officials said they were unaware of any U.S. role in what had been described as a tense sectarian standoff in which the Sunni militants were threatening to kill their Shiite captives if all other Shiites did not leave the town.

    […]

    The confusion over Madain illustrated how quickly rumors spread in a country of deep ethnic and sectarian divides, where the threat of violence is all too real. Poor telephone communications, and the difficulty of traveling from one town to the next because of daily attacks on the roads make it difficult even for government officials to establish the facts.

    National Security Minister Qassim Dawoud warned Parliament on Sunday of attempts to draw the country into sectarian war and said three battalions of Iraqi soldiers, police and U.S. forces were sent to Madain. He said the Iraqi military was planning a large-scale assault on the region by week’s end.

    […]

    Iraq’s most influential Shiite Muslim cleric, Grand Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani, urged government officials to resolve the crisis peacefully, his office said.

    […]

    Also on Sunday, Sheikh Abdul Salam al-Kubaisi, a spokesman for the Association of Muslim Scholars, an organization of Sunni clerics, denied hostages had been taken in Madain. “This news is completely untrue,” he told al-Jazeera television.

    Even al-Quida in Iraq, a group oh so eager to claim part in any or all hardship, has denied involvement and called the reports of mass hostages fabrications.

    Whatever happened in Madain began Thursday when Shiite leaders claimed Sunni militants seriously damaged a town mosque in a bomb attack. The next day, the Shiites said, masked militants drove through town, capturing Shiites residents and threatened to kill them unless all Shiites left.

    Shiite leaders and government officials had earlier estimated 35 to 100 people were taken hostage, but residents disputed the claim, with some saying they had seen no evidence any hostages were taken.

    Security forces began raiding sites Saturday in search of those abducted, Dawoud said.

    The story does illustrate the confusion of war-time reporting, especially when the media seem all too willing to report troublesome rumors as certain news.

  • Taxes Complete

    … but work isn’t. Looks like any additional blogging will be late, if at all.

  • April 15

    The Titanic.

    I’d like to suggest you start with And Rightly So‘s Raven here and her rivet-counting friends of the Titanic Historical Society. After that, let the net carry you where you will.

  • A Request of My Readers

    If anybody gets bored, feel free to leave me a comment reminding me to do my taxes.

    Seriously.

    In case I miss the Post-It note I left for myself in my cube.

  • Soldiers Cleared in Sgrena Shooting … or Not

    From MSNBC (hat tip to the Jawa Report):

    Report Clears U.S. in Friendly Fire Incident

    The friendly fire shooting at a U.S. military checkpoint last month in Baghdad wounded Italian journalist Giuliana Sgrena and killed intelligence agent Nicola Calipari.

    Now, NBC News has learned that a preliminary report from a joint U.S.-Italian investigation has cleared the American soldiers of any wrongdoing and provides new details into the shooting.

    […]

    It was dark when the Italians turned onto a ramp leading to the airport road where the U.S. military had set up a temporary checkpoint.

    The investigation found the car was about 130 yards from the checkpoint when the soldiers flashed their lights as a warning to stop. But the car kept coming and, at 90 yards, warning shots were fired. At 65 yards, when the car failed to stop, the soldiers used lethal force — a machine gun burst that killed Calipari and wounded Sgrena and the driver.

    Senior U.S. military officials say it took only about four seconds from the first warning to the fatal shots, but insist the soldiers acted properly under the current rules of engagement.

    The investigation failed, however, to resolve one critical dispute: The Americans claim the car was racing toward the checkpoint at about 50 miles per hour, the Italians say it was traveling at a much slower speed.

    Wait, the Associated Press says not yet:

    Italy, U.S. Disagree Over Agent Shooting

    Reluctance by Italian investigators to accept the U.S. version of the killing of an Italian security agent by American troops in Iraq last month is holding up the conclusion of a joint inquiry into the shooting, Italian newspapers said Thursday.

    Also Thursday, the U.S. State Department said the investigation was ongoing and denied an NBC report that the U.S.-Italian commission had completed a preliminary report clearing the Americans of any wrongdoing in the killing.

    […]

    “Anyone asserting that conclusions have been reached, or anyone claiming that conclusions have been reached, and they know what they are, must be misinformed,” State Department press officer Thomas Casey said.

    Casey noted that Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice had said on Wednesday after a meeting Italian Foreign Minister Gianfranco Fini that the most important thing was to do the investigation right, not to do it fast.

    An Italian Foreign Ministry official said the commission was continuing its work. The official, speaking on condition of anonymity, declined to comment on the reports of a clash among the investigators.

    For once, she of the everchanging story is quiet:

    Sgrena: I Won’t Comment on Leaks

    “We’ll keep doing whatever we can to find out what happened on March 4 near Baghdad’s airport” Giuliana Sgrena said speaking in the offices of the Province of Rome where she is taking part in a demonstration promoted by the Press Federation to call for the release of Florence Aubese, the correspondent of French newspaper ‘Liberation’ who was kidnapped in Iraq 100 days ago. Giuliana Sgrena chose not to comment the first leaks from the Italy-US Investigating Committee (“I’ll comment only on the conclusions of final official sources”).

    Well, if her version that mentioned 300 to 400 rounds fired or her version where she scooped shells off the seat were true, this would’ve been a pretty cut-and-dried investigation.

    Keep quiet, liar.

  • Dying for Another Tet II

    After the second recent attack on Abu Ghraib, I blogged that the terrorists were trying to use the dramatic attacks to create another Tet.

    The terrorists, despite vows to the contrary, had to watch an Iraqi citizenry give the finger to fear and vote for their own future. The attacks against U.S. troops have repeatedly failed and casualties are declining. It is time for the terrorists to turn back to the Viet Nam playbook – they need another Tet.

    Now, one week and another glorious failure by the terrorists, this one an assault on a Marine encampment near the Syrian border, columnist Austin Bay reaches the same conclusion.

    While bomb attacks on unarmed Iraqi civilians continue (particularly against Shiites), public opinion now matters in Iraq, and the thugs’ public slaughters have killed too many Iraqi innocents. January’s election dramatically lifted public morale and changed the media focus — suddenly, democracy looks possible, and an Arab Muslim democracy is Al Qaeda’s worst nightmare.

    Hence the “Tet gamble.” Bombs haven’t cowed the Iraqi people — but perhaps the American people will lose heart and buckle if Al Qaeda concocts a military surprise.

    U.S. forces, however, are “hard targets” — unlike civilians standing in line to vote, U.S. troops shoot back. Since 9-11, Al Qaeda has never won a military engagement at the platoon level (30 men) or higher. Coalition forward operating bases are heavily fortified.

    But the Tet fantasy is so compelling.

    Go give it a read. Hat tip to In the Bullpen‘s Chad Evans, who adds some solid insight to expand on Bay’s column.

    Al Qaida is not just losing because they are outnumbered, have inferior technology to that of U.S. and Iraqi soldiers, rely on old weaponry funneled in through Iraq’s borders, the fighters have the marksmanship of a virgin hunter, are suffering from heat exhaustion because they have to hide their identity or even because they have had their leaders captured or killed at an alarming rate. Most importantly, Al Qaida and similar terrorist groups are losing in Iraq, Afghanistan and throughout the entire world because the world public rejects their ideology of hatred.

  • Chirac Gives Latest Pro-EU Argument

    Do it to piss off the Brits and the Americans.

    A French Non to the EU constitution will “boomerang” against France and delight “Anglo-Saxon” opponents of a powerful Europe, President Jacques Chirac said.

    In his first major contribution to France’s increasingly sour EU referendum campaign, President Chirac made it clear that, if the country votes “no”, he will ignore the precedent set by his political idol Charles de Gaulle and refuse to resign.

    Debating with 83 young people in a two-hour television political chat show, M. Chirac put up a spirited – if often vague – defence of the proposed new European Union constitution.

    France’s voice in Europe would be “silenced” and “Anglo-Saxon” enemies of the EU – in both Britain and America – would be delighted if the French reject a constitution “largely inspired by France and French values,” he said.

    Far from being a surrender to “liberal” (ie capitalist) values, as left-wing opponents claim, President Chirac said that the constitution enshrined the French view that market forces were essential but should be “organised” and “humanised”.

    […]

    In 13 consecutive opinion polls in the past month, French voters have said that they are planning to reject the EU constitution in a referendum on 29 May. A French Non would in effect wreck the treaty and leave the enlarged EU to struggle on with its existing system of decision-making.

    Opposition to the treaty is especially strong on the left. In part this is a protest vote against 10 per cent unemployment, President Chirac and the floundering centre-right government of Jean-Pierre Raffarin.

    […]

    One young woman asked M. Chirac to give “two or three concrete” examples of how the constitution would benefit France. M. Chirac struggled to give a simple answer. He mentioned a boom in French trade with eastern Europe; the fact that the treaty would enshrine women’s rights; and would increase co-operation against international crime.

    But he kept coming back to his central message: France had nothing to fear; this was a French text, hated by “les Anglo Saxons”.

    M. Chirac was asked if he would follow the example General de Gaulle, who resigned as president in 1969 after losing a referendum on regional government. President Chirac said that he could reply to that question in one word: Non.

    While it seems to be a traditional rallying cry of the French, it is hardly a stirring endorsement of the EU constitution.

  • UN Approves Nuclear Terrorism Treaty

    You can sleep soundly tonight, safe under the warm, fuzzy blanket of security provided by the United Nations.

    The United Nations has approved a treaty aimed at preventing nuclear terrorism. Passage of the measure ends seven years of negotiations.

    In the end, no vote was necessary. The 191-member General Assembly adopted the “International Convention for the Suppression of Acts of Nuclear Terrorism” by consensus.

    There, there, rest your little head. We’re all snug and safe now. The vigilant UN is immediately on the case to deal with a threat.

    The measure is the 13th U.N. anti-terrorism convention, and the first adopted since the September 11, 2001 terror attacks on the United States.

    Well, please realize that “immediately on the case” leaves a lot of room for interpretation.

    The treaty adopted Wednesday obligates governments to prosecute or extradite anyone who possesses or threatens to use radioactive materials with intent to cause death or injury.

    The accord is to be opened for signatures on September 14, during a summit of world leaders in New York. It needs ratification of 22 countries to become international law.

    I expect it to become international law. I expect it to look nice, printed in a good font, adorned by meticulously-drawn signatures on the finest of paper. I also expect its enforcement to show it’s not worth the cost of that paper.

  • Shareholders Vote Down Bulldozer Resolution

    Well, this is an abrupt end to an attempt to have far-left politics intrude on a business.

    Caterpillar Incorporated officials say their shareholders have soundly rejected a resolution that would have directed the company to investigate the use of its bulldozers by the Israeli army.
    The resolution was defeated today at the heavy equipment manufacturer’s annual meeting 97 percent to three percent.

    It stated that Israel has used Caterpillar equipment to destroy more than three-thousand Palestinian homes in the West Bank and Gaza Strip since 2000.

    The fact the the vote was such an overwhelming landslide merely demonstrates it wasn’t a matter of bottom line vs. social justice, but rather a case of rationality vs. lunacy.