Category: General

  • U.S. Indicts Three in Terror Plot

    The U.S. has brought charges against three potential terrorists who are alleged to have been aiming at key American financial targets.

    Federal authorities unsealed an indictment Tuesday against three men in British custody in connection with scouting financial targets in the United States as preparation for a possible terrorist attack.

    Officials have identified the targets as the New York Stock Exchange and Citigroup Center in Manhattan, the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank in Washington, and Prudential headquarters in Newark, New Jersey.

    The three men — all British nationals — were arrested in England in August. At the time, U.S. law enforcement officials raised the terror threat level, citing evidence from “multiple sources” that al Qaeda members were planning another attack on the United States before Election Day.

    It will happen here again, though we stand a better chance now of catching grandiose schemes such as this than previously. The tragedy of 9/11 has objectively been more of a defeat than a victory for the radical Islamist terrorists, both in its enticement to them for greater acts more easily detected and in its spurring our bringing the war to them. That said, as I’ve repeatedly posted before, I believe it will happen here on a smaller, more personal scale.

    We need to steel ourselves to that eventuality. Also, we must remember that, no matter the effort, a huge tragedy could get through the defenses. We have to be right one hundred percent of the time; they only have to slip through once for a wealth of evil glory.

  • Poland Sets Date for Iraq Pullout

    There’s no real news here, other than a fairly certain timetable for the Poles’ withdrawal from their involvement on the ground in Iraq.

    Ending months of uncertainty over the precise timing, Poland announced Tuesday that it would withdraw all its troops from Iraq once the United Nations mandate for the multinational force expires in December.

    Defense Minister Jerzy Szmajdzinski said the cabinet had decided to bring home the 1,700 troops, but he left open the possibility that the mission could be extended if the United Nations mandate were renewed.

    “At the time of the expiry of the Security Council’s mandate, meaning at the end of 2005, the operations of the Polish stabilization mission should be finished,” Szmajdzinski said after the cabinet meeting. He said that Prime Minister Marek Belka’s government would not in the meantime be committing troops to any new missions.

    This has been expected for some time. When a planned withdrawal was first announced, I expressed my gratitude for the Poles’ strong contribution (and have repeatedly called for them to be rewarded as a true ally). Now I thank them for withholding a timetable until significant progress had been made on the ground and in the Iraqi government.

    Today’s article goes on to show why I admire the Polish commitment and efforts — the motives have been as noble as the service.

    Poland’s decision to support the U.S.-led war in Iraq and then provide military assistance annoyed several of its European Union partners. But similar to other former communist countries, Poland said its own experiences of living under dictatorship influenced its decision to back the ousting of the former Iraqi leader, Saddam Hussein, and later provide military assistance and training.

    Additionally, the central and east European countries, some of which joined the NATO military alliance in 1999 and others last April, were much more Atlanticist than some EU countries, particularly France and Germany, which led opposition in Europe to the war in Iraq.

    What’s more, the Poles aren’t washing their hands of the matter, realizing that success in Iraq has long-term implications for Europe and the globe.

    But Poland said it would continue to be involved in helping NATO train Iraqi officers both inside and outside Iraq. A NATO spokesman said Tuesday that more than 1,000 Iraqi officers would be trained by the alliance inside the country during this year and a further 500 officers trained outside in military academies in several countries, including Germany.

    “All NATO countries in one way or other are involved in the training,” said the spokesman.

  • Rummy Warns Iraq Not to Purge Security

    Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld cautioned the new Iraqi government to not go the route of a mass purge of Sunnis and those affiliated with the Ba’ath party from the country’s fledgeling security forces.

    The US defence secretary, Donald Rumsfeld, delivered a thinly veiled warning to Iraq’s government yesterday not to purge the security forces or abuse its power for patronage.

    On a visit to Baghdad Mr Rumsfeld signalled US disapproval of any attempt to sweep Arab Sunnis and former members of the Ba’ath party from the police and army.

    The Shia and Kurdish blocs that will dominate the new administration want to install their supporters in the security services and oust those who served under Saddam Hussein. But Mr Rumsfeld said, in effect, that such people were among the best qualified to tackle the insurgency.

    “It’s important that the new government be attentive to the competence of the people in the ministries and that they avoid unnecessary turbulence.”

    […]
    Mr Rumsfeld used his visit to lobby the newly appointed Kurdish president, Jalal Talabani, and Shia prime minister, Ibrahim al-Jaafari, over key issues. Having won the election and sealed their political ascendance after decades of oppression many Shia and Kurdish politicians want their rebel militias to take a leading role in the state security forces.

    They mistrust interior and defence ministry officials left over from Saddam’s time and accuse some of them of leaking intelligence to an insurgency drawn largely from the Arab Sunni minority.

    Critics say the “deba’athification” process could become a sectarian witchhunt against Sunnis who have the experience lacking in the hastily recruited security forces.

    With the interior and defence ministries offering vast scope for patronage there is also concern that a purge could be an excuse to dole out jobs and contracts to cronies.

    “We have an opportunity to continue to make progress politically, economically … anything that would delay that or disrupt that as a result of turbulence, or lack of confidence or corruption in government, would be unfortunate,” said Mr Rumsfeld.

    Mr Jaafari responded politely but vaguely: “I am sure we are going to form very good ministries. So I think we can cooperate, all of us, and face these challenges successfully.”

    The leading paragraph, with its talk of a “thinly veiled warning,” comes across more harshly than the rest of the story, but that’s the best chance for a reporter to color the news.

    Rummy’s words seem wise — a mass purge or a move to squeeze out Sunnis would be a horrid move, both in terms of public stability and loss of competence. However, the Iraqi government has, to date, been extremely inclusive in its formation, and there is no reason yet to think that this will not continue. Admittedly, I am certain the security forces still contain many of questionable loyalty that should be investigated, watched and possibly removed. However, that does not conflict with Rummy’s wise cautioning against mass purges along religious or political lines.

  • Latest Blogroll Additions

    Sorry for the delay this evening but I’ve been busy as a pager-slave. It was my lousy luck to be oncall after a major software upgrade at work this weekend.

    Anyway, last night I finally got around to adding some blogs to my blogroll that I’ve been checking out for a while. Some of you may already be familiar with them; if not, I would encourage you to visit them. The new additions are as follows:

  • Akbar’s Defense: Kuwait Attack Not Premeditated

    Think your job is tough? Try defending this scumbag.

    An Army sergeant charged with a grenade attack that killed two U.S. officers in Kuwait went on trial Monday, with his lawyer trying to stave off a possible death sentence by arguing that his client suffered from mental illness.

    But a military prosecutor said Sgt. Hasan Akbar knew exactly what he was doing, pointing to his detailed diary entries before the March 2003 attack and the fact that he stole the grenades and cut power to his camp just before striking.

    Well, those do seem to make a strong case for premeditation.

    Premeditation is the central issue in the court-martial of the 33-year-old Akbar, who confessed several times and allegedly told investigators he carried out the attack in the opening days of the Iraq war because he was worried that U.S. forces would harm fellow Muslims.

    With the fact of the attack not in dispute, his lawyers hope to spare him a possible death penalty for premeditated murder by alleging a history of mental illness that stretched back to his teen years and was apparent to the military.

    “The enemy was in Sgt. Akbar’s mind, and had been there 15 years,” defense lawyer Maj. Dan Brookhart told the military jury in his opening statement.

    Brookhart said Akbar’s mental illness stemmed from the sexual abuse of his sister by his stepfather, and as a teenager he was diagnosed with depression and an adjustment disorder. He also developed a sleep disorder and sometimes fell asleep while standing up. In the Army, his problems led to Akbar being demoted from a squad leader’s position and being given menial duties in his combat engineer company.

    Cry me a freakin’ river.

    “He was basically a failure as a soldier,” Brookhart said. He noted that as the 101st awaited orders to invade Iraq in the spring of 2003, Akbar was panicked by talk among his colleagues about their plans to kill Iraqis and rape women.

    Military prosecutor Capt. John Benson countered that evidence indicates Akbar did extensive planning. In diary entries and actions – which included stealing grenades and turning off a generator that lit the camp – Akbar laid the groundwork for his fatal attack.

    The brigade was on alert for an enemy attack, Benson said, but “their enemy was already inside the wire.”

    Fourteen soldiers were wounded, either by the grenades or when Akbar opened fire with a rifle in the ensuing chaos.

    One of the wounded, Capt. Mark Wisher, testified Monday about being blown through the air by the blast. He was wounded on the right side of his body and suffered a collapsed lung, lacerated liver and punctured diaphragm.

    “I heard something hit the wooden floor of our tent and then bounce. I’ve seen movies, Hollywood movies, and grenades sounded like that,” said Wisher.

    The court-martial marks the first time since the Vietnam War that a soldier has been prosecuted for the murder of another soldier during wartime.

    Barring dramatic new evidence, and I honestly don’t expect any, I say kill him. Unfortunately, in our “enlightened” age, I wouldn’t count too heavily on justice deserved being served.

  • Short China-Japan Post

    Their headline:

    Chinese Government Gave OK for Anti-Japan Demonstration

    My response:

    Gee, thanks for the insight, Sparky. Who would’ve thunk it of a totalitarian regime that allows or tramples on dissent as it sees fit?!

  • As Random Musings Become Grumbles

    Longtime blogroll denizen Eric has left Blogger and is moving to his new home in MuNuviana. In doing so, he has left behind his blog’s old name (Eric’s Random Musings) and has chosen the moniker Eric’s Grumbles Before The Grave. Drop by and welcome him to his new home.

    Also, Eric is still in the process of porting his old entries. In the meantime, his previous efforts can still be read at his old site.

  • What I’m Reading Tonight

    Hey, as a proud member of the Coalition of Unpaid Bloggers, I have long reserved the right to remember this is just a hobby.

    I’ve looked for stories to blog about and, while some have been interesting enough to read, none have gripped me enough to comment on them tonight. That said, I’ll leave you with the stories that came close.

    Sadr Loyalists Plan Campaign to Oust US


    Iraqi President Foresees US Troop Withdrawal Within 2 Years

    The Chinese-Japanese Cold War

    States Scramble to Defend Military Bases from Closing (this topic I expect to blog on as the process continues)

  • Quote of the Week, 10 APR 05

    It simply is not true that war never settles anything.

    —Felix Frankfurter

  • Signs of Division in Iraq Insurgency

    In an amazing breakthrough, the Associated Press is reporting of sharp divisions and breakdowns among those who are fighting against a forward-moving Iraq.

    There are growing signs of hostility between secular Iraqi insurgents and Muslim extremists — some of them foreigners — fighting under the banner of al-Qaida.

    The factions have exchanged threats and are increasingly divided over the strategy of violence, much of it targeting civilians, that aims undermine the fragile new government.

    The increased tension, critically, arises as the mainstream component of the Sunni Arab-led insurgency — which remains active, deadly and vibrant nearly two years since it began — has opened a campaign designed to reap political gain out of its violent roots.

    Post-election realities appear to have forced the tactical change as majority Shiites and Kurds consolidate power and the population grows increasingly angry over the largely Sunni-driven insurgency that is killing vast numbers of ordinary people and the country’s fledgling army and police force.

    Well, the AP can’t give up the ghost just yet. I want to point out that I question the following choices of phrasing: “Muslim extremists — some of them foreigners”, “fragile new government”, and “killing vast numbers.” All three of the emphasized words imply an unidentified scale or opinionated wording that could have been either substantiated or phrased in a more neutral manner.

    “You see a withering of the insurgents that had a short-term agenda, like preventing the January election. But the insurgency is not unraveling yet,” said Peter Khalil, former director
    of national security policy for the now-defunct U.S.-led occupation authority in Iraq.

    Now let me selectively quote and add my own punctuation: “You see a withering of the insurgents … but the insurgency is not unraveling … yet.”

    The divide among militants, however, is becoming more noticeable.

    In Ramadi, the capital of Anbar Province and a stronghold of the insurgency, homegrown Iraqi fighters have begun recently to air their differences in menacing fliers plastered on walls and distributed in mosques — making threats and denouncing the tactics of the extremists, according to witnesses who have seen the fliers.

    Some of the fliers threaten reprisals against the militants or threaten to inform police of their identity and whereabouts. The extremists have not publicly responded, but residents say the fighters have kept a low profile since the appearance of the fliers in the Euphrates-side city and that some of them may have moved to the outskirts to avoid clashes.

    Implicit in my bolded portion is an open admission of the growing authority of the Iraqi police forces.

    Ramadi’s insurgents argue that al-Qaida fighters are giving the resistance a bad name and demand they stop targeting civilians and kidnappings. Al-Qaida militants counter that Iraqis who join the army and police are “apostates” — Muslims who renounce their faith — and deserve to be killed.

    “They have tarnished our image and used the jihad to make personal gains,” said Ahmed Hussein, a 30-year-old mosque imam from Ramadi, speaking of al-Qaida fighters. “They have no legitimacy,” said Hussein, who claims insurgency links but says he’s not a fighter himself.

    Not that your image was all that great outside the Arab world anyway, Ahmed. Too long have y’all silently, seemingly condoned kidnappings, beheadings and butchery for your cause.

    In Baghdad’s mainly Sunni Azamiyah district, another insurgency hotbed, residents have repeatedly brought down from walls and street light poles the black banners of al-Qaida in Iraq.

    Repeatedly, but never reported until now.

    Iraq’s newly elected president, Kurdish leader Jalal Talabani, urged insurgents to sit down and talk with the new government, but he’s made it clear his offer is exclusively available to homegrown Iraqi insurgents and not to extremists or foreign fighters.

    “We must find political and peaceful solutions with those duped Iraqis who have been involved in terrorism and pardon them, and invite them to join the democratic process,” Talabani said Thursday as he was sworn in at parliament. “But we must firmly counter and isolate the criminal terrorism that’s imported from abroad and is allied with criminal Baathists.”

    Even the AP is now admitting a wedge exists among the opposition. This is an excellent way for the Iraqi government to slam a mallet against that wedge.

    Ideological or tactical shifts within the insurgency are difficult to gauge because of the secrecy surrounding it and the different, sometime conflicting, agendas of its disparate groups — with the majority of homegrown insurgents hardcore members of Saddam’s Baath party, former members of his army and security forces as well as religious nationalists.

    Associated Press reporters in the insurgency strongholds of Ramadi, Baqouba and Samarra say there have been fewer attacks in those towns in recent weeks. They also report rising hostility toward militants associated with Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, the Jordanian al-Qaida leader in Iraq.

    U.S. defense officials say nationwide attacks were down to 40-45 a day in recent weeks, lower than the pre-election daily average of 50-60.

    The change was apparent after the Jan. 30 elections, with the number of U.S. soldiers killed dropping from 58 in February to 33 in March — the lowest monthly death toll since 20 American soldiers were killed in February 2004, according to an Associated Press count.

    Meanwhile, there are unconfirmed news reports in Arab media that factions of the insurgency may be indirectly negotiating with authorities to lay down their arms in return for amnesty, jobs and reconstruction money. The Iraqi government has not commented.

    I’ve blogged before about the declining casualties and the admission among the Sunnis of their strategic blunder to generally avoid the elections. It’s nice to see the AP slowly catching up to the obvious.

    It’s also good to see our Iraqi opponents, smelling blood in the water, beginning to turn on the foreign radicals and Saddamists holdouts.

    Okay, maybe they aren’t smelling blood in the water. Maybe they are finally seeing the writing on the wall.