Category: Asia Pacific

  • N. Korea: ‘Nuclear Capability to Take on US’

    Sometimes, little dogs don’t realize that they are, in the scheme of things, nothing more than ankle-biters. Sometimes, these dogs think they are ready to square off with bigger dogs. Sometimes, these little yappers press their luck and, if lucky, survive to learn a harsh lesson.

    Enter North Korea, stage left.

    North Korea has enough nuclear weapons to defend itself against an attack by the United States and is building more, according to a member of the regime interviewed on American television.

    The country’s vice-foreign minister, Kim Gye Gwan, also hinted that it had the technology to mount a nuclear warhead on a missile.

    “We have enough nuclear bombs to defend against a US attack,” he said in the interview with ABC. “As for specifically how many we have, that is a secret.”

    When asked about delivery systems, he added: “Our scientists have the knowledge, comparable to other scientists around the world.”

    North Korea is not in danger of an unexpected ground attack from the United States. The fact that we’ve established only a trip-wire defensive stance on the Korean Peninsula has been well known for half a century. The silliness of the statement by communist North Korea is that any attack from the U.S., unprovoked by actual action on the ground, would be delivered by air. The North Korean nukes are worthless against this except as a retaliation. That does not fit into the idea of being a sufficient defense, as it is woefully undemonstrated and falls obviously short of the mutually-assured destruction threshold that is implied.

    The interview, given after the American network was granted a rare visit to Pyongyang, the North Korean capital, is the most detailed public discussion yet by the regime of its capabilities. It will embarrass the Chinese government, which has been trying to convince North Korea, its close ally, to abandon its nuclear weapons programme and stop promoting a Far Eastern arms race.

    China only values North Korea as a geographic buffer between the politically and economically successful South Korea. Red China is currently geographically insulated from any sizable and successful neighbor that it doesn’t control, though it does obviously chafe at the island state of Taiwan. China does not want North Korea to push its bluff too far and fail.

    North Korea has been building plutonium-based bombs since expelling inspectors from the International Atomic Energy Agency more than two years ago, and the Pentagon estimates it has material for at least six.

    The United States also believes it has one or two bombs based on enriched uranium, manufactured with the help of the Pakistani scientist Abdul Qadeer Khan, whose alleged existence triggered the current crisis over its weapons programme.

    What intelligence has been unable to determine is whether North Korea has the ability to deliver the bombs. It is currently developing a version of the long-range Taepodong missile that it hopes will bring the west coast of the United States within range.

    North Korea has wrapped too much of its economy around its military and its nuclear program — it must expand or eventually collapse upon itself. Any conventional victory must be fast and decisive, something it probably cannot attain. However, any nuclear exchange would most likely be one-sided, as the U.S. cannot endanger allies in South Korea and Japan with fallout. Barring actual and truly threatening provocation from the North, the ball is in the commies’ court in terms of initiating conflict. I have little doubt that we can buy enough time on the ground to flatten what remains of the North with conventional means before the South could be completely overrun. That leaves the North’s nukes — used on the peninsula, devastating to the region but useless in the long term of a potential war. Launched overseas, again useless in the long term for North Korea’s hopes for anything other than spiteful destruction.

    That said, now would be a good time to strengthen our efforts into a missile defense and, on a personal note, shy away from investment in West Coast real estate.

  • Arroyo Heading into Political Whirlwind

    Remember Gloria Macapagal Arroyo, Philippine president and the great Manila Folder whose troop withdrawal and ransom payout bankrolled terrorists in Iraq to the tune of $6 million and who wants to buddy up to China’s military? Well, it seems she suddenly has a few problems of her own.

    Arroyo Son, Relative Took Gambling Payoff, Woman Says

    A witness in a Philippine Senate investigation today said she delivered illegal gambling payoffs to President Gloria Arroyo’s son and brother-in-law, who are both congressmen. Stocks, bonds and the peso slumped.

    Philippine president hit by electoral tampering claims

    President Gloria Macapagal Arroyo of the Philippines could face fresh political turmoil following the release of recordings of telephone conversations she made in the weeks after the hotly contested May 2004 elections.

    Alan Paguia, a lawyer for Joseph Estrada, former president, admitted preparing compact discs containing excerpts of Mrs Macapagal’s phone conversations, and said she was talking to a senior member of the independent electoral commission about keeping her lead over rival candidate Fernando Poe Jr, the film actor who died last December.

    Damage control fails as Arroyo’s scandals grow

    It began as a coffee-shop rumor four weeks ago. Then it started circulating in telephone text messages, which, in this SMS-obsessed part of the world, usually indicates something is afoot. This week, the administration of President Gloria Macapagal Arroyo decided to step in and take control of the situation. Or so it thought.

    […]

    Analysts and politicians say the latest scandal, which they deem to be potentially more damaging than the jueteng problem, could plunge the Philippines into political chaos similar to uprisings in 1986 and 2001, when presidents were removed from office.

    Analysts and politicians are predicting massive protests, and businessmen have warned of “dire economic consequences.”

    It couldn’t have happened to a more deserving person. Reap the whirlwind, babe.

  • Hoax Suspected in WWII Holdout Story

    There’s increasing speculation the story of two Japanese soldiers hiding out in the Philippines since later days of World Wars II may be fiction.

    Diplomats from Tokyo said Sunday that they were not giving up on efforts to verify whether two Japanese soldiers had been surviving in the Philippine jungles since World War II. But there was increasing speculation that the astonishing tale could be a hoax.

    The story about the alleged stragglers, reportedly separated from their unit six decades ago, has generated huge interest in Japan. About 100 Japanese journalists descended on the southern port city of General Santos, where the diplomats were staying, creating a security headache in a violent region where Muslim and Communist guerrillas and kidnaper gangs flourish.

    “We are still doing our best to see them and we have not,” a Japanese Embassy spokesman, Shuhei Ogawa, said of the men who have been sought since Friday. “At this moment, it’s not the time to give up.”

    The men – who would now be in their 80s – were said to have been separated from the 30th Division of the Imperial Japanese Army and stayed in the remote mountains on Mindanao island for fear of being court-martialed at home for leaving their unit.

    The Japanese government urged caution, saying the report had come from someone who had not seen the men personally.

    Any possible motivation for such a hoax? Of course there is and, as usual, it’s money.

    Complicating the issue, the area where they supposedly were found is notorious for ransom kidnappings and attacks by Muslim separatists, who have waged war for three decades. Communist rebels also are active there.

    Japan’s Asahi newspaper reported Sunday that a Japanese mediator in General Santos may have paid armed groups roughly $250,000 to secure safe passage from the jungle for the two alleged former soldiers.

    Still, the story could prove true. I remember that one Japanese soldier that was found on Gilligan’s Island.

  • JCS Chair: U.S. Forces Strained

    Well, this is what I call stating the obvious — involvement in a war has stressed the military and eaten into supplies.

    The United States may not be able to win any new wars as quickly as planned because the conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan have strained its armed forces, manpower and resources, the nation’s top military officer has told Congress in a secret report.

    General Richard Myers, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, described the US military as in a period of increased risk, according to a senior defence official.

    “We will prevail,” Gen Myers said when asked about the report. “The timelines [to winning a new war] may have to be extended and we may have to use additional resources, but we’re going to be successful in the end.”

    Gen Myers also predicted the risk would go down in a year or two, the official said.

    “We are at war and that level of operations does have some impact on troops,” White House spokesman Trent Duffy said. “But the president continues to be confident, as well as his military commanders, that we can meet any threat decisively.” Among the most likely conflicts the Pentagon foresees in the near term are with North Korea and Iran, the two remaining members of President Bush’s “axis of evil”.

    About 138,000 American troops are in Iraq. Another 18,000 are in Afghanistan. Military officials have given no precise estimate when they will be able to significantly reduce the number of US troops in Iraq, but some generals have suggested next year.

    That the military, dramatically reduced from Cold War numbers, would quickly feel the burden of conflict in two theaters while trying to maintain a ready posture in others is to be expected. So, too, the questioning of resources, as there has been zero effort towards moving the country to any sort of a war economy.

    I like the spin that we would be unable to win another war “as quickly as planned” but don’t believe it, as the truthfulness of the statement would really depend upon which war is in question.

    In the case of a move into the south by North Korea, I completely believe it, as our forces there have historically been a tripline of sorts. Any action against North Korea has been envisioned as a large advantage in numbers for the communist North and a tremendous advantage in technology and training for the U.S. and South Korea. Add to that decisive advantages of air and naval dominance and the inherent strength of initially fighting on the defensive and you have the long-held formula for Korea: hold on against the numerically-superior onslaught until the allied advantages nullify it and sufficient assets are brought to bear to counterattack..

    I also see the slowed-but-certain victory as accurate if conflict with Iran or Syria rolls around. The issue with Iran is that, should push come to shove before our military has had a sufficient recovery period, I envision a much bloodier campaign for the Iranian people than I would’ve hoped would ever be needed. There is a strong undercurrent for democracy among a large portion of the Iranian populace and, given time and successful democratic governments in neighboring Afghanistan and Iraq, this undercurrent could turn into a violent undertow that threatens to drag under the ruling radical theocracy. Should the Iranian government feel this danger and press the issue with the U.S. before the Army and Marines are back to near-full capability, the war would have to be carried from above. And I ain’t talking about with a delicate touch; I mean the brutality of the “Shock and Awe” that was threatened against Iraq but never truly utilized. That would be necessarily tragic.

    My main question about Myers’ statement is China. If they move against Taiwan, something they are not currently ready for but are upgrading and training for at breakneck speed, time would be of the essence. Defense of Tiawan does not allow for a buying-time mentality. Any invasion would have to be stopped, as success would hinge on preventing any foothold and build-up by the Chinese. To recover Taiwan after a successful Chinese occupation would be for naught — even if the commies are finally, bloodily expelled, Taiwan would be essentially a nation existing in the past tense.

  • Fall of Saigon — Thirty Years Later

    Vietnam Marks War’s End

    Tens of thousands of people gathered here today to commemorate the 30th anniversary of the end of the Vietnam war with the fall of Saigon to Communist forces and the defeat of the US-backed South Vietnamese regime.

    Gala celebrations got under way in the southern economic capital, now renamed Ho Chi Minh City, as people massed on the street in front of the former regime’s presidential palace, now called Reunification Palace.

    Top leaders including Communist Party General Secretary Nong Duc Manh, state President Tran Duc Luong and Prime Minister Phan Van Khai were joined by Raul Castro, Cuba’s defence minister and brother of President Fidel Castro at the ceremony.

    “The victory of April 30, 1975 opened a new era for the Vietnamese people. This glory and this victory belongs first of all to the heroic Vietnamese people,” declared Nguyen Minh Triet, politburo member and party secretary of Ho Chi Minh City.

    The glory and victory of the invading North, the actual aggressors along with their Soviet allies, were not to be shared by all of the Vietnamese people, as thousands were subsequently killed by the conquering communists and thousands upon thousands more suffered for almost two generations under the dictatorship of a gasping, dying ideology that now turns to the “aggressor” U.S. for friendly cooperation.

    The day is also marked rather differently by John and the denizens of Argghhh!!!. I especially direct you to the remembrances of the day in the comments, where several, including some vets, have posted their memories of the moment. Here’s a painful one from John:

    I just stood behind my Dad in the family room, watching the blood flow from the 5 Purple Hearts his tour in Vietnam garnered… as a little bit of his soul leaked out of each one, as he sat watching the television.

    In his book Summons of the Trumpet, an excellent history of the U.S. involvement in Viet Nam, Dave R. Palmer did not write of the glory of the fall of Saigon but instead looked at how the U.S. failed an ally and scrambled to save what and whom it could.

    Meanwhile, with the time bought by the ARVN stand above Saigon, the United States was able to evacuate most Americans and tens of thousands of South Vietnamese who were related to Americans or were marked for death because of their affiliation with various U.S. activities in South Vietnam. The last group out was extracted in a day-long helicopter shuttle started after North Vietnamese gunners began shelling the city. Two American marines were killed when a round struck the building which had once housed the MACV headquarters. The last to die in the long war, neither had been born when the United States began to back Diem with advisors in 1954.

    When the final chopper lifted off, carrying the last marine guards, it signalled the humiliating end to a once bright American dream of preventing a communist takeover of South Vietnam. The trumpet was silent.

    That is the true heritage of the day. And the U.S. military has unfairly been forced to labor vigorously to salvage its reputation — globally, historically and in the eyes of the American people — ever since that day thirty years ago, a day when the American military did not lose but the U.S. did.

  • Gallipoli Dead Remembered at Dawn

    Ninety years ago tomorrow, one of the bloodiest blunders in military history began. At dawn, the World War I star-crossed campaign of Gallipoli will be honored.

    The bloody World War I landing of Australian and New Zealand troops in Gallipoli will be remembered at a solemn dawn ceremony on Monday.

    Australian Prime Minister John Howard, his New Zealand counterpart Helen Clark and Britain’s Prince Charles will make the pilgrimage to the Turkish bay.

    The campaign was aimed at capturing Istanbul and providing a supply line to Russia 90 years ago.

    But more than 100,000, including 20,000 Irish and British, never returned home.

    The site of the down service is named Anzac cove after the Australian and New Zealand Army Corps who landed there on 25 April 1915.

    Thousands of visitors from the two countries are expected to attend the largest gathering ever at the site.

    The campaign ended eight months later, when the Allied Forces abandoned the peninsula.

    “To walk on the battlefields of Gallipoli is to walk on ground where so much blood was shed it has become almost sacred soil,” Helen Clark said at a ceremony to honour Turkey’s fallen troops on Sunday.

    “For New Zealand as for Australia it was at Gallipoli that our young nations came of age.”

    Go read for much more on the tragic campaign. I would also recommend the Mel Gibson flick of the same name.

    I, for one, will mark the day with the haunting tune “The Band Played Waltzing Matilda” by the Pogues.

    But the band played Waltzing Matilda
    As we stopped to bury our slain
    We buried ours and the Turks buried theirs
    Then we started all over again

    Full lyrics can be found here.

  • Keeping with the Theme o’ the Day

    Religion. Religion. Religion.

    Air Force Cadets See Religious Harassment

    Less than two years after it was plunged into a rape scandal, the Air Force Academy is scrambling to address complaints that evangelical Christians wield so much influence at the school that anti-Semitism and other forms of religious harassment have become pervasive.

    There have been 55 complaints of religious discrimination at the academy in the past four years, including cases in which a Jewish cadet was told the Holocaust was revenge for the death of Jesus and another was called a Christ killer by a fellow cadet.

    The 4,300-student school recently started requiring staff members and cadets to take a 50-minute religious-tolerance class.

    “There are things that have happened that have been inappropriate. And they have been addressed and resolved,” said Col. Michael Whittington, the academy’s chief chaplain.

    More than 90 percent of the cadets identify themselves as Christian. A cadet survey in 2003 found that half had heard religious slurs and jokes, and that many non-Christians believed Christians get special treatment.

    […]

    Critics of the academy say the sometimes-public endorsement of Christianity by high-ranking staff has contributed to a climate of fear and violates the constitutional separation of church and state at a taxpayer-supported school whose mission is to produce Air Force leaders.
    […]

    “They are deliberately trivializing the problem so that we don’t have another situation the magnitude of the sex assault scandal. It is inextricably intertwined in every aspect of the academy,” said Mikey Weinstein of Albuquerque, N.M., a 1977 graduate who has sent two sons to the school. He said the younger, Curtis, has been called a “filthy Jew” many times.

    There’s more examples of complaints, both vague and specific, in the story. Even those of a religious bent who boisterously proclaim, “There’s no atheists in a foxhole” have to admit that any foxholes around Colorado Springs are relatively safe. The military has an obligation to respect and protect the individual religious beliefs or non-beliefs of its personnel, as long as they do not interfere with the mission.

    I do recommend that, during the initial weeks of basic training, atheists joining the Army may do well to become religious. That treasured hour or two on Sunday morning may be your only break from the drill sergeants for a while.

    China Calls for New Pope to Break Taiwan Ties

    Beijing called on new Pope Benedict XVI to break ties with Taiwan and stay out of China’s internal affairs to create the conditions for better Sino-Vatican relations.

    “We are willing to improve the relationship between China and the Vatican on the basis of two principles,” said foreign ministry spokesman Qin Gang of ties that were ruptured in 1951 when China expelled the Vatican’s ambassador.

    “One is that Joseph Ratzinger should break off the so-called diplomatic relationship with Taiwan and recognise that the government of the People’s Republic of China is the only legitimate government which represents China and that Taiwan is an inseparable part of China.

    “The second is that Ratzinger should not interfere in internal Chinese affairs, including in the name of religion.

    “We hope that with a new Pope, the Vatican can create conditions to improve China-Vatican relations.”

    Despite not recognizing the authority of the Pope, the official Chinese Catholic Patriotic Association had sent a congratulatory telegram “in the name of the Bishops and believers of the whole country,” the ministry said.

    It added that congregations had been told to pray for Pope Benedict XVI.

    China’s Roman Catholics are divided into two churches — the government-approved “patriotic” church which does not recognize the authority of the Pope, and the underground church where adherents accept the pontiff as leader.

    The government church has about four million worshippers, according to official figures, while the underground church has about 10 million, based on Vatican estimates.

    Breaking through half-a-century of enmity to re-establish relations with China may be the greatest diplomatic challenge facing Pope Benedict XVI as he takes on the mantle as leader of 1.1 billion Roman Catholics worldwide.

    Fixing broken ties with China would spread the new pontiff’s spiritual realm to the most populous nation on earth, home to 1.3 billion people. But it is precisely that global influence that scares Beijing.

    China sent no representative to Pope John Paul II’s funeral in Rome on April 8 to protest the presence of Taiwan President Chen Shui-bian at the event. Any hint of recognition of Taipei infuriates China, which considers the island a rebel province.

    The spat obscured mounting signs of an effort by the Vatican to crack China’s resistance to the Roman Catholic Church.

    Does anybody know how to say, “Um, yeah, right, whatever, talk to the ring” in Latin?

  • Short China-Japan Post

    Their headline:

    Chinese Government Gave OK for Anti-Japan Demonstration

    My response:

    Gee, thanks for the insight, Sparky. Who would’ve thunk it of a totalitarian regime that allows or tramples on dissent as it sees fit?!

  • What I’m Reading Tonight

    Hey, as a proud member of the Coalition of Unpaid Bloggers, I have long reserved the right to remember this is just a hobby.

    I’ve looked for stories to blog about and, while some have been interesting enough to read, none have gripped me enough to comment on them tonight. That said, I’ll leave you with the stories that came close.

    Sadr Loyalists Plan Campaign to Oust US


    Iraqi President Foresees US Troop Withdrawal Within 2 Years

    The Chinese-Japanese Cold War

    States Scramble to Defend Military Bases from Closing (this topic I expect to blog on as the process continues)

  • Thais Fear Bombs Mean Southern Unrest Spreading

    Well, once again reality bitchslaps the “peace in our time” approach as bombs rattle Thailand.

    Thai authorities imposed extra security measures on Monday amid fears that unrest in the Muslim far south is spreading after bombs hit an airport, hotel and supermarket just outside the violence-hit region.

    Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra said the almost simultaneous Sunday evening blasts, which security officials blamed on Islamic militants, had raised concern across the Buddhist country.

    The bombs, which police said consisted of dynamite and fertilizer and which were detonated by mobile phone, killed two people and wounded 60, seven critically, health officials said.

    “This doesn’t only worry me. It worries the whole nation,” Thaksin told reporters.

    I’m shocked, shocked to find that the origami birds of peace didn’t pacify the Islamists.