Category: War on Terror

  • 74 Dead as Islamic Militants Stage Attacks in Southern Russia

    Radical elements of the Religion o’ Peace are at it again, and yet again Russia is facing the brunt.

    Islamic militants staged coordinated attacks on police and government buildings in the southern Russian city of Nalchik today, as fresh violence spilled over from war-torn Chechnya to the broader North Caucasus region.

    By early evening, 12 police, 12 civilians and more than 50 guerrillas had died in the day’s fighting, authorities said.

    As night fell, militants were holding several people hostage in a Nalchik police station, Russian First Deputy Interior Minister Alexander Chekalin told reporters. Three guerrillas were also barricaded in a souvenir shop, he said.

    Chekalin estimated the number of militants involved in the attacks at a maximum of 100, but other officials said there could be up to 300 involved.

    Russian President Vladimir V. Putin ordered the city of 235,000 be cordoned off to prevent militants from escaping overnight.

    “The president gave an instruction that not one gunman should be allowed to leave the town, and those who are armed and putting up resistance must be wiped out,” Chekalin said after meeting Putin, the Russian news agency Interfax reported.

    I’ve asked before, but isn’t it about time that we acknowledge that Russia is facing that same expansionist Islamic threat that the U.S. and its allies are fighting elsewhere?

    Meanwhile, Gateway Pundit is all over this story here and here.

  • Brother, Can You Spare a Dime?

    Nah, but here’s 250 Iraqi dinars, guaranteed by Saddam Hussein himself.

    I’ve blogged before of my old Guard buddy and college friend Bill, both preparing for Iraq and while in the Sandbox. Recently, I mentioned he had mailed me some Saddam-adorned cash. At the request of elgato, seconded by the Gunn Nutt, I’ve scanned in the largest bill, both front and back. Click on the images for bigger versions.

    Front:
    Big Bucks
    Back:
    No Whammies
  • Al Qaeda Letter Called ‘Chilling’

    In your letter you said you didn’t love me
    You said you’re gonna leave me
    But you could’ve said it better
    Oh in your letter, you said you couldn’t face me
    You said you could replace me
    But you could’ve said it better

    —REO Speedwagon

    Well, yes, aspects of a released letter from al Queda’s second-string quarterback Ayman al-Zawahiri to Triple-A Iraq League QB Abu al-Zarqawi indeed could be considered chilling … given the big “if” that the anti-war factions in the West get their way and the U.S. bails before the mission of an established democratic Iraq is actually accomplished.

    Senior U.S. intelligence officials call a letter from al Qaeda’s No. 2 man to its leader in Iraq “chilling” because of how “calm, clear and well argued” it is in urging preparation for a U.S. departure from Iraq.

    According to a translation of the 6,300-word letter provided by the U.S. government, Ayman al-Zawahiri predicts “the Americans will exit soon” from Iraq and says “things may develop faster than we imagine.”

    […]

    The letter outlines a four-stage plan to expand the war in Iraq: Expel U.S. forces, establish an Islamic authority, take the fight to Iraq’s secular neighbors and battle with Israel — “because Israel was established only to challenge any new Islamic entity.”

    The letter says: “We must be ready starting now, before events overtake us, and before we are surprised by the conspiracies of the Americans and the United Nations and their plans to fill the void behind them.”

    First, yes, we are still feeling the repercussions of our tail-between-the-legs withdrawals from Viet Nam and Somalia. The lesson learned by the world and the radical Islamist jihadists in particular: bloody the Americans and they will falter, wilt and betray their own ideals.

    Second, there are no “conspiracies” about what we hope to leave behind us in Iraq. Our plans are quite transparent and disgusting to the radical Islamists — we simply hope to inject a virus into the Middle East and the heart of the sprawling Islamic world. That virus? Liberty and self-determination, the opportunity to build a better life for one’s self and one’s family, notions that are an anathema to we-are-victims-kill-the-oppressors feeding trough from which the Jihadists, and arguably most of the current ruling Arab governments, gather their sustenence.

    That said, there is much hope in this letter, as the Jihadist Zawahiri seems to be almost as concerned about losing the media war as I have been. I still feel that our media has been far too beneficial to our enemy’s cause, but it is interesting to note that the bad guys are concerned about hearts and minds and especially throats. Oh yeah, other Muslim targets also may be problematic for the bastards’ cause.

    “I say to you: that we are in a battle, and that more than half of this battle is taking place in the battlefield of the media,” al-Zawahiri writes.

    “The Muslim populace who love and support you will never find palatable … the scenes of slaughtering the hostages,” he warns al-Zarqawi, self-proclaimed leader of al Qaeda in Iraq.

    Al-Zawahiri also criticizes al-Zarqawi’s attacks on Shiites and reminds him that Shiite Iran is holding more than 100 al Qaeda prisoners — many of them leaders such as Saif al-Adel and Osama bin Laden’s son, Saad.

    “Is the opening of another front now in addition to the front against the Americans and the government a wise decision?” al-Zawahiri asks. “Or does this conflict with Shia lift the burden from the Americans by diverting the mujahedeen to the Shia, while the Americans continue to control matters from afar?”

    The U.S. strongly vouches for the authenticity of the letter, and some have interesting ways of characterizing the document.

    A senior U.S. intelligence official said he was “absolutely confident” the letter is genuine.

    This official described the letter’s language as that of “an al Qaeda elder to an occasionally hotheaded field commander” — language, sources said, that President Bush had seen before he delivered a speech on the war on terror last week.

    “It is cowardice that seeks to kill children and the elderly with car bombs and cuts the throat of a bound captive and targets worshippers leaving a mosque,” President Bush said October 6.

    Nice retort by the president — just the sort of tone to counter current terror tactics in Iraq. I find the elder-field commander analogy interesting. Make no mistake, Zawahiri and Zarqawi ain’t no Eisenhower and Patton. After all, recall any stories of General Patton trying to mooch a few bucks off ol’ Dwight David?

    Dated two days after the London terror attacks of July 7, the letter makes no mention of those attacks and pleads for more information, suggesting al-Zawahiri is feeling cut off.

    He describes difficulties he and al Qaeda are facing more than a dozen times; says the real danger to him comes from Pakistani army operations in the tribal areas; and asks al-Zarqawi whether he could spare a “hundred thousand” dollars.

    We absolutely must stay the course, as the enemy is obviously in disagreement over tactics and disarray over resources.

    Meanwhile, this piece looks at the letter and sees a potentially more ominous note for al Queda.

    There are signs of tension within the al-Qaida leadership, and between them and their followers in Iraq, says a reporter who has followed the movement closely.

    “I think there’s something going on between (al-Qaida leader Osama) bin Laden and (his deputy Ayman al-)Zawahiri. I think Zawahiri is not absolutely happy with what’s going on. I would even go as far as suggesting that maybe Zawahiri doesn’t really know where bin Laden is,” said Yosri Fouda, investigative reporter for the Arabic-language al-Jazeera television network.

    […]

    “He was rather concerned about his own constituency, his own supporters,” commented Foudra of Zawahiri’s letter.

    Others blogging on the letter: Belmont Club, Jawa Report, In the Bullpen.

  • MilBlogs: Something Bookish This Way Comes

    Matt at Blackfive, one of the very best MilBloggers out there, has a huge announcement — a planned publishing of a military blogging anthology.

    Simon & Schuster has agreed to publish a collection from military bloggers sometime in late 2006. I submitted the proposal and will be the editor and one of the many authors.

    We will bring together the best of the military blogs, the purest distillation of the myriad voices of this war. These bloggers provide a powerful insight into the military, the War on Terror, and the heart of our nation. By bringing these voices together, we offer the first real-time, “oral” history of a war while it still going on. We will provide stories from many of the military blogs that cover the full range of the experience of this war – from the decision to serve in the military to their return home, from the front lines to the home front, and from the med-evac units and hospitals where the price of freedom is paid in blood and suffering to the friends that made the ultimate sacrifice.

    In his announcement, Matt requests reader input on possible material. Also in the post is a description of MilBlogging enticing enough to be worthy of the book’s cover jacket.

    In the past, the experiences of war have produced poetry and novels and memoirs. The War on Terror is different: we’re seeing through a new set of eyes, a new kind of literature. In real time, on the Internet, officers and enlisted men and women are chronicling the war on weblogs.

    […]

    Imagine if the men and women fighting World War II could have somehow told their stories daily for all to hear…imagine if Audie Murphy or George Patton could have broadcast their experiences of a battle the day after it occurred – while the experience was still fresh in their minds and without time taking the edges off of their memories.

    That’s what military bloggers are doing today – offering unfettered access to the War on Terror in their own words – each one speaking to anyone, everyone who has access to the Web. For the first time, the public does not have to wait months or years to hear what happened from the individual soldier’s point of view. They don’t have to settle for the government’s approved messages. These bloggers are soldiers who return to their bases and type their daily experiences onto the Internet for anyone to read. Never before has this happened, has the information come so fast, so real and so unfiltered. This is the power of a blog.

    Normally, knowing all too well the grumbling, griping nature soldiers seemingly instinctively put on along with the uniform, I would be hesitant about such instant access to a world-wide audience for everyday troops. Surprisingly though, with few media exceptions, the blogs of the troops have been the only voices showing the actual action of this war and demonstrating the generally positive morale of those fighting it. The media has brought us the casualty figures, but the MilBloggers have brought us the stories of the war.

    Hat tips to Outside the Beltway, the Mudville Gazette and the Gunn Nutt for repeatedly pointing me to this story today.

  • U.S. Uses ‘Iron Fist’ in Iraq

    The U.S. is conducting an offensive against the terrorists in Iraq. I find Canada’s Globe and Mail coverage of the effort to be amazingly negative in story and poor in detail, even for our supposed allies to the north.

    A U.S. offensive aimed at al-Qaeda in Iraq insurgents in western Iraq entered its third day Monday, with air strikes in a town on the banks of the Euphrates River, witnesses said. At least 36 militants have died since the fighting began, officials said.

    No serious U.S. casualties have been reported in the “Iron Fist” offensive by 1,000 Marines, soldiers and sailors near the Syrian border.

    Well, so far, so bland. That must stop. So, too, must actual reporting of the offensive, as the story turns now towards negative news elsewhere in Iraq. Hey, the alleged point of the story got over sixty words — time to shift to unrelated gloom-and-doom.

    In Baghdad, Iraq’s oil minister narrowly survived an assassination attempt when a roadside bomb blasted his seven-car convoy, killing three of his escorts, officials said.

    Elsewhere, roadside bombs and fighting between insurgents and Iraqi forces on Monday wounded at least seven Iraqis in Ramadi, a militant stronghold west of the capital, police and hospital officials said.

    Insurgents wearing black hoods were seen carrying machine guns and rocket-propelled grenades in the city’s streets, and Iraqi civilians gathered around two burning Iraqi army pickup trucks. Some of the civilians celebrated the destruction by carrying Iraqi military helmets and a uniform that appeared to have been pulled from the burning Iraqi vehicles.

    In the northern city of Mosul, a drive-by shooting killed Nafi’a Aziz, a female member of Ninevah’s provincial council, and her son, said police spokesman Brig. Saeed Ahmed. Mr. Aziz was in charge of the council’s human rights committee and a member of the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan, the party of Iraqi President Jalal Talabani.

    The offensive and street fighting come less than two weeks before the national referendum on a new Iraqi constitution. Al-Qaeda in Iraq and other groups in the Sunni-led insurgency have killed at least 207 people over the past eight days in a bid to wreck the vote.

    On Sunday, Al-Qaeda in Iraq claimed to have taken two U.S. Marines captive during the fighting and threatened to kill them within 24 hours unless all female Sunni detainees are released from U.S. and Iraqi prisons in the country. The U.S. military said the claim appeared false but that it was conducting checks “to verify that all Marines are accounted for.”

    Well, that should be enough to quash any optimism about the offensive. Let’s actually return to that offensive, shall we?

    The offensive in western Iraq by 1,000 Marines, soldiers and sailors began early Saturday in the village of Sadah and has since spread to Karabilah and Rumana, two nearby towns on the banks of the Euphrates River. On Monday, witnesses told The Associated Press that helicopter attacks on Rumana were sending up clouds of black smoke.

    No casualties were immediately reported in Monday’s fighting by the witnesses, who spoke on condition of anonymity out of concern for their own safety, or by the U.S. military command center in Baghdad.

    The military says al-Qaeda in Iraq, the country’s most feared insurgent group, has turned the area near Iraq’s border into a “sanctuary” and a way-station for foreign fighters entering from Syria.

    In Karabilah, Marines clashed with insurgents who opened fire from a building on Sunday in a firefight that killed eight militants, the military said.

    Most of the militants appeared to have slipped out of Sadah before the force moved in, and hundreds of the village’s residents fled into Syria ahead of the assault.

    There was “virtually no opposition” in Sadah, the Marine commander in western Anbar province, Col. Stephen W. Davis said.

    At least 28 militants were killed in fighting Sunday, Davis said, bringing the two-day toll among insurgents to 36. There have been no serious U.S. casualties in the operation, he said.

    Okay, the American offensive appears to be going well, time to cast a pall on that.

    On Monday, a CNN journalist embedded with Marines in eastern Karabilah filed video showing the attack. About 20 Iraqi civilians fled the fighting, and the wounded included an Iraqi mother, father and their child, who were bleeding after being hit by flying pieces of concrete.

    Oh holy crap! Civilians in a combat zone were injured by flying bits of building! Oh the humanity! Damn, but large portions of Canada really need wake up, crawl out from under the blanket of protection their southerly neighbors have afforded them for apparently far too long, and actually come face-to-face with a real threat. I doubt their grandfathers on D-Day fretted overly much about bystanders being stung by inadvertant debris.

    The rest of the story ignores the offensive and returns to the negative stories covered earlier. It’s almost like the author wants the reader to know a successful operation is underway, but doesn’t want that news to bring any good vibes. On the other hand, for balance’s sake, the article does wrap up with a slightly positive tidbit, again unrelated to the offensive.

    Elsewhere, Shiite militiamen released the recently kidnapped brother of Iraq’s interior minister, the freed man, Abdul-Jabbar Jabr said.

    Well, there, that’s fair coverage of a friend’s successful venture, wouldn’t you say?

    Meanwhile, Chad over at In the Bullpen has a rather speculative story that al Queda in Iraq may be considering bailing on, well, Iraq as a base of operations. Continued offensives like those barely covered above would certainly play a role in such a maneuver. Chad goes on to ponder about possible new sites for the terrorist base of operations.

    Where would they move? The Sinai is the first place I’d look for any reemergence, but there’s also Northern Africa and the Horn of Africa to consider.

    As I’ve noted before, the U.S. military is already planning for such a relocation.

  • Afghan Troops Kill ’31 Taleban’

    As expected, anti-terror efforts continue in the fledgling democracy of Afghanistan. Also as expect, those efforts go bloody but bloody well.

    At least 31 suspected Taleban militants have been killed in clashes with government troops in south-east Afghanistan, officials say.

    Defence Ministry spokesman Gen Mohammed Zaher Azimi said fighting erupted after insurgents attacked an Afghan army post near Angore Adda in Paktika province.

    At least four government troops were injured in the battle near the Pakistan border, which lasted over four hours.

    It was the heaviest reported fighting since elections two weeks ago.

    Gen Azimi said 28 militants had been killed in fighting on Sunday night. Three others were killed in a separate clash in the province earlier in the day.

    […]

    The US military, which has a base in the area, said US troops had not been involved in the fighting.

    More than 1,000 people have been killed in violence linked to militancy in Afghanistan this year.

    Most of those killed have been suspected militants, but more than 80 US troops have also died, about 50 of them in hostile fire.

    A number of civilians and election candidates and workers have also been killed.

    […]

    Afghanistan’s parliamentary and provincial elections on 18 September were hailed as a landmark in the process to bring democracy after years of war.

    The counting of votes is still continuing.

    The repeated inability of the Taliban and al Queda terrorists to disrupt national elections, coupled with their demonstrated ability to die in sizable numbers at the hands of both American and native forces, has to be held as good news for the Afghan theater.

  • England Convicted, Awaiting Sentence

    As if the overly-publicisized photos weren’t enough, there’s finally a guilty verdict to the case of the Abu Ghraib scandal’s poster girl.

    Army Pfc. Lynndie England, whose smiling poses in photos of detainee abuse at Baghdad’s Abu Ghraib prison made her the face of the scandal, was convicted Monday by a military jury on six of seven counts.

    England, 22, was found guilty of one count of conspiracy, four counts of maltreating detainees and one count of committing an indecent act. She was acquitted on a second conspiracy count.

    The jury of five male Army officers took about two hours to reach its verdict. Her case now moves to the sentencing phase, which will be heard by the same jury beginning Tuesday.

    England tried to plead guilty in May to the same counts she faced this month in exchange for an undisclosed sentencing cap, but a judge threw out the plea deal. She now faces a maximum 10 years in prison.

    I’m glad the smitten-moron defense didn’t carry the day. Now, I hope for the maximum penalty for a woman who did everything she certainly knew was wrong. Granted, she had no clue what the impact on global affairs would be, but she certainly knew the UCMJ and her lawful orders.

  • Sheehan: Busted by the Left and the Law

    Regarding Gold Star mom Cindy Sheehan, the dear Mother Sheehan of the anti-war movement, I recently blogged that she was fighting tooth and nail for a sixteenth minute of fame.

    Meanwhile, my lingering question about Gold Star mom Cindy Sheehan is this: Is there some sort of methadone equivalent for limelight addiction?

    I guess I did not know then the extent of her adult attention desire disorder, nor the lengths that Gold Star mom Cindy Sheehan would go to in her need to feed on publicity.

    First, Angry in the Great White North catches Gold Star mom Cindy Sheehan whining over the weekend at the Daily Kos. Her complaint? Hurricane Rita was getting too much coverage, leaving one to conclude just who Gold Star mom Cindy Sheehan felt was robbed by this.

    i am watching cnn and it is 100 percent rita…even though it is a little wind and a little rain…it is bad, but there are other things going on in this country today…and in the world!!!!

    Even for the Kos leftists, this is childishly too far. Angry in the GWN has selected several comments that I wish you would read. Here’s a small taste:

    Give it a rest

    Sorry Cindy, but I must say that the suffering in Texas right now is quite pertinent. In fact, at a time when we have people suffering, left homeless and devastated from “a little wind and a little rain,” I think you can take a break from the camera just for a moment.

    That wasn’t enough to slow Gold Star mom Cindy Sheehan, though. After getting appropriately rebuffed by the left, Gold Star mom Cindy Sheehan today decided to fight the law.

    A leading anti-Iraq war activist has been arrested outside the White House for what supporters say was as an act of civil disobedience.

    Anti-war protesters ended three days of demonstrations in Washington by congregating at one of the main gates to the White House.

    Police asked them several times to move on, saying they were gathering in a restricted area. When they refused, they were arrested.

    The first to be taken into custody was Cindy Sheehan, the mother of a soldier who was killed in Iraq and a leader of the anti-war campaign. She moved to the public arena last month when she staged a vigil outside the Bush family ranch in Texas, demanding a meeting with the president.

    As her supporters applauded, she was taken away by police and was expected to be released after being processed on minor charges.

    The law won.

    So, too, did Gold Star mom Cindy Sheehan. Currently, a Google News search for her name and the word “arrested” returns 1,130 articles and many more related entries. Ahhhh … Gold Star mom Cindy Sheehan scored another attention fix at last!

    Still, John Hinderaker at Power Line finds reason to question Gold Star mom Cindy Sheehan’s judgement in this little circus of civil disobediance.

    I may be wrong about this, but I don’t think it is wise for Sheehan to go out of her way to cultivate associations between her anti-war protest and similar events in the 1960s. I really don’t think that images of her being carried away by policemen, hobnobbing with Communists, marching with Joan Baez and Jesse Jackson, etc., are helpful to her cause. I think such actions will cause light bulbs to go on in many Americans’ heads as they realize, “Oh, she’s one of those!” [emphasis in original]

    So true, but also true is the concern that the media will fail to convey to the public the radically out-of-the-mainstream nature of Gold Star mom Cindy Sheehan’s statements and associates. Had the media already been willing to objectively do so, Mother Sheehan would have been but a pitied blip on the nation’s radar.

  • D.C. Protests: Associated Press Picks Side

    In straight news reporting, the lede is everything. The opening paragraph should carry the gist of the entire article and answer all of the fundamental questions of who, what, when, where and how. Why is questionable, as it can paint a bias on the story or be immediately undetermined.

    This weekend, the American capital of Washington, D.C. saw back-to-back gatherings of anti-war and pro-troop rallies. The Associated Press’ lede paragraph for today’s rally in support of the U.S. efforts in Iraq is as follows:

    Support for U.S. troops fighting abroad mixed with anger toward anti-war demonstrators at home as hundreds of people, far fewer than organizers had expected, rallied Sunday on the National Mall just a day after a massive protest against the war in Iraq.

    My attention is immediately drawn towards the mention of anger. Actually, my first reaction is that I dare you to diagram that rather poorly written sentence. Past that, I’m taken by the mention of anger in the lede. Why? Well, let’s look at the lede from the AP’s coverage of Saturday’s rally.

    Opponents of the war in Iraq rallied by the thousands Saturday to demand the return of U.S. troops, staging a day of protest, song and remembrance of the dead in marches through Washington and other American and European cities.

    What? Song and remembrance? No anger?

    Well, judging by photoblogging by Michelle Malkin and Davids Medienkritik, I would beg to differ. There seems to have been a great deal of unreported anger at Saturday’s shin dig. Meanwhile, Gateway Pundit followed Saturday’s speeches and seems to have identified a great deal of anger, as well as a great deal of failed leftist talking points.

    So why no mention of anger Saturday while it made the lede Sunday? Well, I’ll leave it to one of the best bloggers out there, Jeff Goldstein, to absolutely rip the puff piece that was Saturday’s “news” story by the A.P. Suffice it to say that the A.P. has happily allowed the slant of their writers to overwhelm their supposed straight news reporting.

    As the Indepundit allows a Marine in Iraq to point out, this weekend was critical for the home front of the war against the radical Islamist movement and our efforts in Iraq.

    Thanks for doing this. The battlefield this weekend will be on the homefront. The only thing that truly concerns me is that the seditionist groups will succeed in causing the American people to lose their will and the enemy will win politically the victory we have denied them militarily.

    Let there be no mistake: we are winning here. Morale is outstanding and we are successfully taking the fight to the enemy. You will see a successful referendum in less than 3 weeks and a successfull election in less than 3 months. I see the positive resuts of our actions everyday. The MSM ignores or denigrates almost every piece of positive news, exaggerates every negative and makes the enemy and his actions out to be more than they are.

    They absolutely cannot defeat us militarily and have no strategic vision except the destruction of all who oppose them. A strategy based on such a negative is doomed to fail, unless we cut and run. That is the enemy’s only chance to win. The biggest threat we face is a determined enemy who will not quit because, like the Vietnamese they see the possibility of victory because of a perceived willingness to quit at home.

    Folks, in the war the Marine describes, the A.P. has long since chosen sides. This weekend, they made it very freakin’ obvious.

  • Non-Rita Quick Hits

    Defense says Lynndie England easily influenced by lover

    Army Pfc. Lynndie England’s attorneys, marshaling their defense for the first time Wednesday, laid blame for her participation in the Abu Ghraib prison scandal on her blind love for and trust of soldier Charles Graner Jr., whom the Army put in charge of part of the dangerous Iraqi facility.

    England, who attended special-education classes for much of her childhood, has learned to rely on strong authority figures, her lead attorney said, and that left her vulnerable to Graner in Abu Ghraib, where their unit took dozens of photos and videos of naked prisoners in humiliating positions in late 2003. Graner has already been convicted.

    “He’s older than I am. He’s been around. He’s experienced,” her attorney, Capt. Jonathan Crisp, said of England’s feelings. “He’s a corrections officer in the civilian world. He must know what’s going on. I love him; he loves me. Everybody looks up to him.”

    England, 22, a reservist from West Virginia, stands accused of two counts of conspiracy, four counts of mistreatment of prisoners and one count of indecent acts in connection with the photos. If convicted of all counts, she could face an 11-year prison sentence.

    I doubt strongly that this defense will stand up, as England, like every soldier, was well versed in the Universal Code of Military Justice. Peer pressure or love or stupidity ain’t an out. The poster child for the anti-war left’s (read New York Time’s) Abu Ghraib campaign has to pay her due.

    Pelosi willing to give up S.F. funds for recovery

    House Minority Leader Rep. Nancy Pelosi of San Francisco said Tuesday she was willing to return to the federal Treasury $70 million designated for San Francisco projects in the new highway and transportation bill and use the money to help pay for Hurricane Katrina recovery efforts.

    Well, obviously that portion of federal spending was expendable. If only we could find some other places to cut spending.

    Sheehan’s Anti-War Campaign Now in D.C.

    Anti-war activist Cindy Sheehan pledged Wednesday to “force change to happen” during protest speeches outside the White House and Capitol.

    Sheehan arrived in Washington after a three-week cross-country bus tour that began near President Bush’s ranch in Crawford, Texas. She is expected to participate in an anti-Iraq war rally Saturday that organizers hope could draw tens of thousands of people.

    Sheehan, whose 24-year-old son, Army Spc. Casey Sheehan, was killed last year in Iraq, wants Bush to explain why he sent the United States to war and say what steps he will take to end the conflict.

    “This is where we will force change to happen because we the people of America are the checks and balances on this government,” she said. “And we will end this war.”

    […]

    Sheehan’s one-woman protest in Texas this August re-energized the anti-war movement as well as supporters of the U.S.-led invasion and of American troops serving in Iraq. Rallies in opposition to the anti-war protesters also are set for this weekend in the capital.

    I’ve already given my thoughts on Gold Star mom Cindy Sheehan. I’ll leave it to Confederate Yankee to nail what is missing from WaPo’s story:

    The AP, Washington Post, and other news sources gleefully mentioned Cindy Sheehan’s march on the White House this afternoon. With the exception of Reuters, however, they were all more than willing to forego this little tidbit of information:

    “Mrs Sheehan was joined by about 30 supporters in her march down Pennsylvania Avenue to deliver a letter to Bush urging him to pull the troops out of Iraq.”

    That’s all, folks. I count 29 people. This is her entire protest party. Including Cindy.

    Hamas chief hints at compromise

    THE militant Islamic group Hamas could one day accept the existence of the state of Israel and negotiate, one of its political leaders said yesterday in an unprecedented sign of compromise.

    For years, Hamas has criticised the ruling Fatah movement of the Palestinian Authority president, Mahmoud Abbas, for allegedly selling out claims to all of historic Palestine by recognising Israel and confining the Palestinian struggle to the West Bank and Gaza Strip areas occupied in the 1967 Middle East war.

    But Mohammed Ghazal, a respected figure within the movement from the West Bank city of Nablus, said yesterday: “The [Hamas] charter is not the Koran.

    “Historically, we believe all of Palestine belongs to the Palestinians, but we’re talking now about reality, about political solutions. The realities are different.”

    Hamas is about to join the Palestinian Authority’s political system by participating in January’s legislative elections.

    Analysts differed over whether Mr Ghazal’s comments suggested Hamas might take a more moderate approach.

    The movement has made it clear it will not disarm its military wing, responsible for dozens of suicide bombings against civilian and military targets, even after the election.

    Mr Ghazal’s remarks were described as “unusual” and “a new language” by Ziyad Abu Amr, a Palestinian MP who is also an expert on the movement. But they elicited cool reactions from other leading figures within Hamas and from Israel.

    The new language is a reaction to a possible line in the sand by Israel about Hamas’ role in upcoming PA elections. Israel, which has already willingly and unilaterally withdrawn from the Gaza Strip, has certainly earned a little cooperation from the Palestinian side, though I have no faith in Hamas actually making any serious steps toward a mutually beneficial future. I expect this development to be little more than a reactive twitch on the face of a terrorist organization that once claimed it was politically ready to rule Palestine but currently sees the Palestinians as ungovernable.