Category: War on Terror

  • Violence Flares in Uzbekistan

    Protests and prisoners. Bloodshed and hostages. Uzbekistan teeters on the edge of a precipice and, of course, radical Islamists are involved.

    Police opened fire on thousands of protesters in the central Asian state of Uzbekistan yesterday, after an armed mob stormed a jail to free 23 men accused of Islamist extremism.

    At least 12 people were killed and dozens injured in the fighting in the eastern town of Andijan. Fifteen police officers were held hostage by rioters.

    Demonstrators in the central square demanded the resignation of the authoritarian president, Islam Karimov. Some protesters had taken over the local administration building and were flanked by men armed with machine guns.

    Yesterday afternoon, witnesses reported that a truck of soldiers drove into the crowd three times, firing into it or into the air. “I was lying down, but the guy next to me was dead,” said one witness. He said he had seen five people injured in the shooting.

    The government claimed that protesters had opened fire on troops. It insisted it was in control of the town and had retaken the administration building in bitter fighting with armed protesters.

    A government source told Reuters last night: “The square has been cleared. Protesters have left. The building has been freed from those who seized it. The search for weapons is under way.”

    The witness said he and other protesters were fleeing the town. “It’s too dangerous here,” he said. The last gunfire had been at 7pm local time on a main road near the centre.

    Protesters reportedly used a police hostage as a “human shield” when engaging troops. The authorities said in a televised statement: “The militants are sheltering behind women, children and hostages. They will not compromise with the authorities.”

    Some reports said that 50 people had died in clashes with the police. Mr Karimov’s press service said he had rushed to the scene to negotiate. Officials said he had later returned to the capital, Tashkent.

    The unrest threatened to spark wider popular revolt in Uzbekistan, an impoverished state of 26 million people. It borders Kyrgyzstan, where violent protests in March ousted the country’s authoritarian government. Uzbekistan, the most brutal dictatorship in the former Soviet Union, has cracked down on dissent since three protest-led regime changes swept through the region in the last 19 months.

    Yes, this is one former Soviet republic that has played a very important role in the war against Islamist terror, particularly in the Afghanistan theater.

    Uzbekistan has been a US ally in the war on terror since 2001, and hosts a vital airbase in the south. Critics say this has caused Washington to turn a blind eye to its torture record. The US last night called on the government and protesters to show restraint.

    “We are concerned about the outbreak of violence, particularly by some members of a terrorist organisation that were freed from prison,” White House spokesman Scott McClellan said.

    Much more information and analysis can be found at Captain’s Quarters, Publius Pundit and especially Registan, a blog I was previously unfamiliar with that is all over the story with several posts and updates, starting here.

  • Is Osama’s Location Known?

    Chad at In the Bullpen shows that the chief of the general staff of the Israeli Defense Forces thinks so. Me, I’m not exactly sold. Fine, I’ll believe in a narrowing down to a small region, but that doesn’t mean it is a militarily or politically actionable deal … yet.

    Waziristan is fairly large and is home to several different tribes and warlords. It is believed many of these tribes are friendly to Osama Bin Laden and Al Qaida. This is the area of the map where it is known that Osama Bin Laden, rumored that he rode out on horseback, fled during the Tora Bora operation under a cease-fire. It was believed he did not go too far, yet no one has known. How Ya’alon knows is beyond me, however Israel’s intelligence service is one of the best in the world.

    Assuming Ya’alon and U.S. Intelligence are correct and Osama Bin Laden is hiding out in Waziristan, allow me to discuss just a bit on what would need to happen in order to get him.

    Good start. Go read.

    Personally, I don’t care too terribly much about catching bin Laden. Yeah, I’d love it and I would hope that he would suffer horribly and painfully at our hands. And I ain’t talking panties-on-the-head or naked-human-pyramid-Twister suffering. I mean pain.

    That said, bin Laden is really but a pawn in this war. We’re dealing with a conflict of the centuries — the fifteenth versus the twenty-first. The objective is to provide an alternative, a shining city on the Arab hill, to the atmosphere that allowed bin Laden and his murderous followers to be given a sizable say in popular belief in the region. This war is not against one man but one belief — one radical, backward and violent thread of Islam. Chad agrees.

    I contend that even if Bin Laden was either killed or captured it would do little to nothing to win the war on terror. We must attack radical Islam at the root cause and not just the people calling the shots.

    Iraq plays a role in this. They may, if we stay resolute, be the start of the alternative hope of which I speak.

    Yes, I want bin Laden caught … and skinned. However, only at a time when his capture will help and not harm our process, as a bold thrust by Americans into Pakistan currently would do.

  • Hard Labor for Missing Duty

    Convicted yesterday, leftist peacenik and so-called serviceman Pablo Paredes was sentenced today.

    A military judge ordered a Navy sailor on Thursday to complete three months of hard labor for refusing to deploy with his ship in protest of the war in Iraq, but he declined prosecutors’ requests for time in custody.

    Lt. Cmdr. Bob Klant also reduced Pablo Paredes’ rank from petty officer third class to seaman recruit, the lowest in the Navy.

    […]

    Prosecutors had asked Klant to sentence Paredes to nine months in confinement, three months less than the possible maximum, and a bad conduct discharge.

    “He is trying to infect the military with his own philosophy of disobedience,” prosecutor Lt. Brandon Hale said. “Sailors all over the world will want to know whether this will be tolerated. Sailors want to know whether doing what he did is a good way to get out of deployment.”

    Prosecutors left the courtroom without making any statements, but Sam Samuelson, a Navy spokesman, said Paredes’ guilty verdict sent a message.

    “His actions were in conflict with his duty and taxpayers’ obligations that the Navy maintain good order and discipline,” Samuelson said.

    Paredes got off way too easily. His lawyers know it and consider it a victory.

    Paredes’ lawyer, Jeremy Warren, called the judge’s lesser sentence “a stunning blow to the prosecution.”

    “This is an affirmation of every sailor’s and military person’s right to speak out and follow their conscience,” he said.

    Actually, a guilty verdict is exactly not that, jackass.

    Paredes and his ilk are cancers to the service and our society. Paredes himself is even worse — he’s a publicity whore of a cancer.

    Paredes arrived at the Navy pier that day wearing a T-shirt that read “Like a Cabinet Member, I Resign” and handed over his military ID card, telling a military police officer “I quit.” Paredes has alerted the media to his plans and a crowd of TV cameras was waiting for him.

    The judge seemed troubled by Paredes’ conduct – wearing a “silly T-shirt” with an incoherent message and staging a news conference that upset sailors and Marines who were saying goodbye to their families.

    With all that, I say again this immature little punk got off way to easily. I do wonder, though, how his fellow sailors will treat him in the future.

  • A Look at Looking at MilTech

    Ours on the sand, theirs below the waves.

    I’ve recently shown you articles that take a look at the role the M1-series tank is currently playing in Iraq and have stated the I view the Stryker as a complement rather than a competitor to the tank. Now, columnist Austin Bay examines the continuing need for the beast.

    Like Mark Twain’s death, the demise of the tank has been “greatly exaggerated.”

    Go there. Good read. Ug, me happy tanker.

    Now, in the today’s very early hours I posted of a new Iranian submarine program and hoped for feedback from Chapomatic. He has obliged and generally disagreed with me.

    I’m probably biased because I have been known to be near some of those submarine things, but if I had the industrial base, a small submarine for coastal defense near a strait would be an effective naval choice.

    In my defense, I did not realize at the time that the program in question was for minisubs (such is the hazard of research via dial-up). I will concur that minisubs would have a great value in coastal affairs, but disagree by arguing that, in the highly-trafficked Persian Gulf, the minisub option has probably a extremely limited degree of hope in affecting travel through the Straits of Hormuz.

  • Cowards, Shirkers and Peaceniks Unite!

    Citizen Smash points out that today was declared National Day of Action for GI Resisters.

    YOU PROBABLY DIDN’T KNOW that Tuesday was a “National Day of Action for GI Resisters.” Well, it was! Notices were sent out to activists all over the country, urging them to converge on Fort Stewart, Georgia and San Diego, California to support “GI resisters” Kevin Benderman and Pablo Paredes.

    Here in San Diego, people came in caravans from as far as San Francisco to participate in the event. Local activists were asked to host vistors. Army deserter Camilo Mejia and conscientious objector Aidan Delgado both came out to show their support. A banquet hall big enough to hold 700 people was reserved. The media were notified.

    Smash attended the kickoff session and gives us his thoughts of the gathering. Go read.

    Meanwhile, the Navy celebrated the day by convicting one of the speakers, shirker Pablo Paredes.

    A Navy sailor turned anti-war activist was convicted Wednesday of missing his ship’s movement when he refused to board the USS Bonhomme Richard as it deployed to the Persian Gulf in December.

    A military judge deliberated about 40 minutes before finding Petty Officer 3rd Class Pablo Paredes guilty of the count.

    […]

    Paredes, a 23-year-old from the New York City borough of the Bronx, could receive a year in jail, a forfeiture of pay, reduction in rank and a bad-conduct discharge.

    […]

    While his shipmates bid farewell to loved ones, Paredes sat pierside and told reporters he did not want to be part of a war he considers illegal and immoral. He said his military training taught him to avoid what he views as a war crime.

    […]

    Paredes says he was a different person when he joined the Navy in 2000, looking for a job and a way to get a college education. The Navy sent him to Yokosuka, Japan and once there, he says he had something of an awakening.

    He began devouring works by writers like Noam Chomsky, the MIT linguistics professor and political activist. He joined political discussions with like-minded friends who criticized the Bush administration.

    Paredes is no coward. Well, he may be, but it cannot be determined from this story as his deployment would have offered little or no personal danger. What can be determined is that Paredes is a pathetic, immature peacenik leftist who would happily trade shoving extra duty onto his supposed brothers in arms for a little publicity.

  • Iran Making First Locally Built Submarine

    An interesting development — I have little doubt that this will end up costing lives … brave Iranian lives.

    Iran on Tuesday officially launched production of its first locally built submarine, a craft that can fire missiles and torpedoes at the same time, state-run television reported.

    Defense Ministry spokesman Mohammad Imani was quoted as saying “the enemy would not be able to detect the submarine.” He did not elaborate.

    My guess is magic. Either that, or outdated technology acquired from bigger players on the world stage.

    One submarine has apparently already been built and was shown on television Tuesday, cruising at sea level. The Defense Ministry has commissioned an unspecified number of the craft that’s been dubbed “Ghadir.” Ghadir is a site in the Arabian Peninsula holy to Shiite Muslims, the overwhelming majority of Iran’s 69 million people.

    The submarine is capable of operating in the Persian Gulf and Oman sea waters, according to the report, which did not specify the range of its projectiles.

    In December, Iran announced the production of a line of stealth torpedoes that could be launched from helicopters, ships or submarines.

    Iranian officials have repeatedly said the Islamic Republic will defend itself should the United States or Israel initiate any aggression.

    For Iran’s sake, I would suggest that they focus more on areas where they can actually make a difference. While both the air and sea are our domain, this effort is nothing more than a publicity stunt. The sea is not theirs, and they are only risking brave sailors by putting them into the honored Silent Service on a much-disadvantaged basis. When you don’t control the above or the surface and can only pretend to manage a part of the below, you have the makings of a very bad idea.

    I hope that Chapomatic will take a look at this from his own applicable perspective.

  • Paks, Afghans Outraged Over Alleged Koran Desecration

    I have little interest personally in this story of alleged insulting treatment of the Koran at Guantanamo other than to say, if true, well, that’s pretty freakin’ stupid and needs to be corrected. Fast.

    Unfortunately but not surprisingly, the story has some in a state of near-apoplexy.

    Pakistan, a key Muslim ally in the U.S.-led war on terror, has voiced deep concern to Washington over a magazine report that U.S. interrogators in Guantanamo Bay desecrated the Koran.

    Newsweek magazine, in its latest edition, quoted sources as saying that investigators probing abuses at the military prison had found that interrogators “had placed Korans on toilets, and in at least one case flushed a holy book down the toilet.”

    The Foreign Ministry said in a statement that Pakistan conveyed its deep concern to Washington over the reported desecration of the Muslim holy book, which sparked a student protest in Afghanistan and outraged Pakistani lawmakers.

    “U.S. officials have stated that the alleged perpetrators of the reported desecration would be held accountable after the matter had been appropriately investigated and responsibility is established,” the statement said.

    There has been growing public outrage in Pakistan over the report. The National Assembly, parliament’s lower house, on Monday passed a resolution denouncing the reported desecration and Imran Khan, a Pakistani cricketer turned politician, last week demanded an apology from the United States.

    In Jalalabad, Afghanistan, about 2,000 students chanting “Death to America” protested over the reported desecration, some of them holding up an effigy of President Bush and shouting “Death to Bush.”

    […]

    State Department spokesman Tom Casey said the United States took the allegations seriously.

    “Obviously, the destruction of any kind of holy book, whether it’s a Bible or a Koran or any other document like that, is something that’s reprehensible and not in keeping with U.S. policies and practices,” he said.

    Quite counter-productive to our overall efforts. Such tales certainly endanger some of our successes to date if not dealt with properly. Oh yeah, did I already say stupid?

    On the bright side, there is this, the wrath of a particular Pak pol.

    Cricket hero-turned politician Imran Khan joined Pakistan’s parliament in denouncing the alleged desecration of Islam’s holy book, the Koran, by US soldiers at Guantanamo Bay.

    Khan also condemned a US newspaper for publishing what politicians say is a humiliating cartoon about Pakistan’s hunt for Al-Qaeda chief Osama bin Laden, the Associated Press of Pakistan reported.

    “If the United States does not apologise on these incidents, then they must be asked to wrap up and vacate our bases under their use,” Khan was quoted as saying.

    Khan!!!

    Man, I love any excuse to use that link.

  • U.S.: 100 Insurgents Killed Near Iraq-Syria Border

    Perhaps the action is a reaction spurred by the recent rash of bombings. Perhaps it is a movement of opportunity based on only-recently acquired data. Probably it’s both — some new information that allowed a movement against a porous border region at a time when the insurgents are greatly in need of another beating. Either way, the coalition forces are back on the offensive, this time pressing the issue and bloodying the enemy near the Syrian border.

    American forces have killed at least 100 insurgents and foreign fighters in an offensive near Iraq’s border with Syria, U.S. military officials said Monday.

    The offensive, which began Saturday, involves more than 1,000 U.S. troops in an attempt to crack down on the network headed by terrorist Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, the military said.

    Three Marines from the 2nd Marine Division have died in the fighting, two on Sunday and one Monday, the military said.

    Officials said much of the fighting has been in the Al Jazirah Desert north of Qaim, a city along the Euphrates River in Anbar province on the Syrian border.

    The area has “basically [been] a sanctuary” for insurgents, said Col. Bob Chase, a Marine operations officer based at Camp Blue Diamond in Ramadi.

    A military press release said the region was known as a smuggling route. Insurgents have been using “known points of entry and ‘rat lines,’ as we call them, to bring in weapons illegally,” Chase said.

    Based on their “equipment and dress,” Chase said most of the insurgents are believed to be foreign fighters, not Iraqis.

    The offensive involves forces from the U.S. Army, Navy and Marines, the military said. Aircraft include Marine Corps jets, Chase said.

    Casualties have been “extremely light on the coalition side,” Chase said, “and conversely there have been a lot of enemy casualties.”

    Many of the fighters “are starting to flee, and we are continuing to press the attack.”

    Chase said the operation began after Iraqis provided information on the whereabouts of the insurgents.

    “The people are starting to be frustrated with these insurgents and with these foreign fighters,” he told CNN.

    “The offensive started based on some significant intelligence received from some very brave folks who live in that part of the country.”

    Meanwhile, Zarqawi’s group calls the report of devastating casualties lies.

    The Al-Qaeda group of Iraq’s most-wanted militant Abu Musab al-Zarqawi denied a US report on Monday that 75 insurgents had been killed in a sweep near the Syrian border.

    ‘The adorers of the cross claim to have killed 75 Muslims at Al-Qaim. Once more, they are lying, because lying is their religion,’ said the statement on an Islamist website, the authenticity of which could not be verified.

    Of course they’re lies, Mr. Terrorist. Oh, and by the way, how’s that inpenetrable defense of Fallujah treating y’all these days?

  • Marines Recall Some Body Armor

    The Marines have issued a recall on over 5,000 armored vests which have had mixed results during testing.

    When the U.S. Marines stormed into Fallujah last November — in the deadliest urban combat of the war — many may have been wearing body armor that may be flawed. But it wasn’t until last week the Marines ordered more than 5,000 of the potentially defective vests recalled.

    The so-called Interceptor bulletproof vests are manufactured by Point Blank Armor of Pompano Beach, Fla., and are supposed to stop a 9mm bullet. But government tests showed that bullets fully penetrated some vests.

    A Marine Corps memo dated July 19, 2004, warned that Army tests on one lot of vests “yielded failing results.”

    But with the war heating up in Iraq, there was such a demand for more body armor the Marines ordered a separate, independent test. The Marine Corps says the armor passed that test, so nearly 5,300 from the suspected defective lot were passed out to Marines.

    The story was first reported by the independent paper Marine Corps Times after an eight-month investigation.

    “There are still vests that are rejected by contractors out there in the field,” says Marine Corps Times reporter Christian Lowe.

    Monday, a company spokesman for Point Blank told NBC News, “We stand by our product” and “We do not know of any casualties or injuries related to the vest.”

    The Marine Corps said Monday the vests are capable of stopping a 9mm bullet, but nevertheless ordered the extended recall last week.

    The problem is that after extended wear and tear, serial numbers on each vest may be blurred and difficult to trace — making it impossible to tell which Marines are wearing what government experts claim are potentially defective vests.

    Without adequate alternatives at the time, it certainly seems prudent to have additional testing. After all, some armor is certainly more protective than no armor.

  • U.S. Doubts Anti-Iraq Forces Can Keep It Up

    Attacks in Iraq have been on the uptick of late, over-shadowing the formation of the country’s first government derived by the will of the people. Bombins and attacks have dramatically increased, but does this portend a new phase in the theater or an unsustainable play for attention? The U.S. believes it’s the latter.

    Insurgents in Iraq are drawing on dozens of stockpiled, bomb-rigged cars and groups of foreign fighters smuggled into the country in recent weeks to carry out most of the suicide attacks that have killed about 300 people in past 10 days, senior American officers and intelligence officials say.

    The insurgents exploded 135 car bombs in April, up from 69 in March, and more than in any other month in the two-year American occupation. For the first time last month, more than 50 percent of the car-bombings were suicide attacks, some remotely detonated, suggesting that Iraqis, who typically do not use that tactic, are being forced or duped into driving those missions, one top American general said.

    That’s an interesting note about the increase in suicide car-bombings. Team that note with this story of a blackmailed would-be bomber and one has to take special note of the tactical change. Simply put, it reeks of desperate motives.

    Why the desperation? The Iraqi populace and time are not on the side of the terrorists. Momentum for the forward-moving nation has to be stopped before progress can be reversed. The bad guys have failed to bring about a sufficiently bloody moment to force the U.S. to cut and run, as had been the plans of all opposing the U.S. since Mogadishu in 1993. A sustained effort did not stop January’s momentous elections. Tactics had to change and risks had to be taken.

    Senior American officers predict that the insurgents, including Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, the Jordanian militant whose network has claimed responsibility for the deadliest suicide bombings, will not be able to sustain the level of attacks much longer. And the attacks have not yet dented recruiting for the American-trained Iraqi security forces.

    But these officers acknowledged that the heightened suicide bombings over the last two weeks, while probably a last-ditch effort, have won the militants important propaganda victories by gaining worldwide news coverage, increasing insurgent morale that flagged after the Jan. 30 elections, and depicting the new Iraqi government as incapable of protecting its citizenry.

    “When he cranks up the propaganda campaign, it means we’ve probably hurt him,” Brigadier General John DeFreitas 3rd, the senior military intelligence officer in Iraq, said of Zarqawi. “It’s a tool in his arsenal and he has used it effectively.”

    Yes, propaganda is a tool that Zarqawi and his terrrorist cohorts are rather adept at utilizing. Why is that tool so valuable and how does it fit in with their desperation? Several, including myself and others, have written that they are trying to manipulate a seemingly-willing media to create another Tet, another defeat generated from victory. And that, dear readers, is something that haunts the American military.

    In interviews with a dozen senior military officers in Iraq or with experience there, as well as with other American officials, varying assessments emerged, underscoring the military’s opaque understanding of exactly how the disparate strands of the insurgency operate and coordinate with each other.

    One senior officer said the recent violence was a predictable “attempt by the enemy to show that they are still a factor, still relevant and still capable.”

    The bombings, this officer said, “grabbed the headlines, drowned out the good news of a newly formed government, attacked the credibility and legitimacy of the new government.”

    Another top officer with extensive experience in Iraq said it would not matter if the suicide car-bombings subsided if the insurgents “feel that they achieved their information-operation objectives.”

    A third officer, a general with extensive command experience in Iraq, said that he was not sure yet what the rash of suicide car-bombings meant: “More foreign fighters? More religious extremists? An indicator of insurgent desperation? Iraqis as suicide attackers?”

    My answer is C, an indicator of insurgent desperation.

    Attacks against allied forces had dropped to about 40 a day in March and early April, and now they stand at 55 a day, well below the 130 a day in the days before the Jan. 30 elections, but roughly the same as last fall.

    Attacks against power stations, pipelines and other infrastructure have declined sharply in the past three weeks as insurgents shifted their attacks to Iraqi security forces, U.S. officers said.

    An assault last month against the Abu Ghraib prison, which wounded 44 Americans and 13 Iraqi prisoners, as well as smaller strikes almost daily since then against the prison that became the center of the prisoner-abuse scandal, have been ineffective militarily but successful as a means of propaganda, DeFreitas said.

    “Abu Ghraib is a huge symbol for the insurgents,” he said.

    Attacks against U.S. forces are indeed off sharply. April 2005 came in as ninth of the previous twelve in terms of American casualties and eleventh of twelve for American deaths (source). No, this uptick in attacks is against two targets — the Iraqi people and symbols such as Abu Ghraib — and have only one goal in mind — headlines.

    Top commanders said they expected spikes and lulls in the violence through at least early next year.

    “It takes everything they’ve got to muster attacks,” Major General Stephen Johnson, the Marine commander in Iraq, said. “Unless the insurgents get involved in the political process, I think we’ll continue to see this.”

    Yes, it’s far from over and we will continue to see times such as this. Especially when CNN.com is willing to give top billing to the death of three Americans over the capture of the mastermind who was behind most of the attacks discussed in this article, just because those three drove total U.S. casualty figures to the easily-reported round number of 1,600.