Category: Middle East

  • Iraqi Stampede: Mass Tragedy with Questions

    Today’s story of a mass stampede, driven by panic, grew more horrific as the announced death tolls grew. First 600. Then 800. Then this.

    A thousand pilgrims crushed and drowned in ‘bomb’ panic

    The death toll in the worst single loss of life since the start of the Iraq war was last night heading towards 1,000 after a crowd of about one million Shiite pilgrims making their way across a bridge in Baghdad panicked at reports of a suicide bomber in their midst and stampeded.

    Most of the dead were women and children.

    Insurgents had already targeted the pilgrims with mortars earlier in the day, killing at least seven, and there were rumours circulating in the crowd that a number of people had also died after eating poisoned food.

    But according to Iraq’s interior minister Bayan Jabor, and two leading Shiite officials, the stampede was triggered by a rumour of a suicide bomber in the crowd. Mr Jabor blamed terrorists for starting the rumour.

    Hundreds of thousands of Shiites had been marching across the Azamiyah bridge, which links a Sunni and Shiite neighbourhood, heading for the tomb of Imam Mousa al-Kadhim, a 9th century Shiite saint.

    As the crowd panicked and began to push and shove to get away, many were trapped against a security checkpoint at the western end. Some fell, only to be trampled under foot, and others plunged off the sides of the bridge into the waters of the Tigris river below. Some reports suggested that the railings at the side of the bridge had given way.

    “We were on the bridge. It was so crowded. Thousands of people were surrounding me,” said a survivor, Fadhel Ali, 28, barefoot and soaking wet. “We heard that a suicide attacker was among the crowd. Everybody was yelling, so I jumped from the bridge into the river, swam and reached the bank. I saw women, children and old men falling after me into the water.”

    Abdul-Mutalib Mohammed, the health minister, said that there were “huge crowds on the bridge and the disaster happened when someone shouted that there is a suicide bomber on the bridge”.

    “This led to a state of panic among the pilgrims and they started to push each other and there were many cases of suffocation,” he said.

    Police said hundreds of people started running and throwing themselves off the bridge into the river.

    “Many elderly died immediately as a result of the stampede but dozens drowned. Many bodies are still in the river and boats are working on picking them up,” said one police officer.

    However, at least one report raises questions after surveys of the aftermath.

    Questions Arising about Alleged Bridge Stampede in Baghdad

    Accompanied by both U.S. and Iraqi army officials, VOA arrived at the Kadhimiya bridge about two o’clock Wednesday afternoon, roughly three hours after news agencies and television news stations began reporting that a deadly stampede had occurred at the site.

    […]

    The Iraqi army brigadier general in charge of security on the Kadhimiya side, Jaleel Khalaf Shuail, says he did not witness the stampede, but was told how it began. General Shuail says someone apparently screamed that a suicide bomber was among the crowd of people and triggered the panic.

    On the bridge itself Wednesday afternoon, there was one striking sight, which did suggest that something catastrophic had occurred earlier. Hundreds of pairs of shoes littered both sides of the two-lane bridge, which some Iraqis said belonged to the more than 900 Shi’ites who allegedly perished in the stampede.

    But there was also a strange absence of ambulances, medical personnel and rescue activities on the bridge or in the river. There was no sign of blood anywhere on the bridge and not a drop of blood could be found on a row of knee-high concrete barriers, which many of the victims were said to have been crushed against.

    The barriers had been placed there the day before to deter suicide car bombings. Iraqi and U.S. military personnel, stationed at guard towers at a nearby base with a clear view of the bridge, report that they saw nothing out of the ordinary occurring on the bridge all morning.

    Footage of the bridge from an American reconnaissance plane also shows no activity consistent with the reports of mass panic and deaths. The only confirmed incident on Wednesday in Kadhimiya was an early morning mortar and rocket attack, targeting the Shi’ite shrine where an estimated one million Shi’ites from around the country had gathered by day’s end.

    VOA visited the nearby Kadhimiya Hospital and found eight bodies and 33 civilians being treated for wounds.

    While certainly not a refutation of the story of mass death, the scene shortly afterwards does raise some points to ponder.

  • You Want Links?

    I got links.

    Carnival of Liberty IX

    I’d like to point that the latest installment of the Life, Liberty, Property community‘s Carnival of Liberty. Go read another fine collection of posts from a libertarian slant.

    US air strikes on Syrian border kill ‘known terrorist’

    The United States launched air strikes near the Iraq-Syria border yesterday, destroying three houses and killing a “known terrorist”, according to the US military.

    Iraqi authorities said fighting had broken out in the area between a tribe that supports foreign fighters and another that backs the government.

    The attacks by F-16 jets began in a cluster of towns along the Syrian border, near Qaim, 200 miles north-west of Baghdad. The US said four bombs were used to destroy a house occupied by “terrorists” outside the town of Husaybah. Two further bombs destroyed a second house, said to be occupied by Abu Islam, described as “a known terrorist”.

    Scratch at least one bad guy. However, I find it interesting, in a disturbing kind of way, that we have identified a tribe that supports foreign terrorists and haven’t hit it with an iron fist.

    Sunni leap of faith

    Iraq’s proposed constitution can be faulted for its contradictions and ambiguities. If those were its only problems, however, the outlook for this democracy-founding document would look a lot better than it now does, for constitutions the world over share these characteristics.

    The greatest flaw is not what’s in this draft, but how it was handled: presented to Iraq’s National Assembly on Sunday over the objections of Sunni negotiators. In effect, one of the major groups in the three-legged stool that makes up Iraq is missing.

    A constitution derives legitimacy and power from national consensus. The document hammered out in Baghdad this summer rightly declares it is “the people” who are “the source of authority” for constitutional rule of law. No consensus, no country.

    Leaders of the minority Sunnis, who ruled Iraq under Saddam Hussein’s dictatorship and who make up about 20 percent of Iraq’s population, now vow to wage a campaign of opposition to the constitution, which comes to voters for approval in October. If two-thirds of voters in three Iraqi provinces reject it, then a newly elected parliament would have to write a new document. With enough votes this fall, the Sunnis could indeed put the process back at square one.

    But it’s not too late for a Sunni buy-in. And surprisingly, it’s the contradictory and ambiguous nature of the proposed constitution that could help bring Sunnis on board.

    It’s an interesting look at the proposed Iraqi constitution and what it’s wording may mean to the Sunnis. Although I have not perused the constitution yet, I see that Sunnis as having two choices: mildly support the document and become more of a player on the scene or oppose it outright. Should they oppose it and it is still ratified, the Sunnis run the risk of perpetuating their errors of turning out in low numbers in January’s elections.

    Arroyo likely to escape ousting

    Lawmakers in the Philippines are due to resume their deliberations about which of three impeachment complaints to take up against President Gloria Arroyo.

    They are expected to choose the weakest option, and are then highly likely to vote it down, effectively thwarting any attempt to oust her from office.

    Mrs Arroyo faces accusations of corruption and electoral fraud.

    She denies any wrongdoing but admits to a “lapse in judgement” in phoning an election officer during the 2004 poll.

    This is truly looking like a shame. The Philippines are passing by an opportunity to remove a center of corruption. I will never forgive this woman, the Manila folder whose willingness to retreat from Iraq for one life while throwing money at the terrorists has quite probably cost lives, both innocent Iraqis and brave Americans.

    Bush enters immigration debate

    President Bush flew into the heart of the nation’s volatile debate over illegal immigration Monday and defended his administration’s efforts to control the nearby border with Mexico after a surge of criticism from across the political spectrum.

    Two weeks after the Democratic governors of Arizona and New Mexico declared states of emergency along the border, Bush used a Medicare speech here to promise local residents an increasingly robust federal campaign that will deploy more agents and provide more detention space to stop those trying to sneak into the country.

    “We have an obligation to enforce the borders,” Bush said to applause. “I understand it’s putting a strain on your resources. What I’m telling you is there’s a lot of people working hard to get the job done, but there is more we can do.”

    Of course there’s more we can do. After this, I want a lot more done. Maybe it’s finally time we start considering our borders as one of the front lines in the war against radical Islamist terror.

  • On the Road Again

    Well, nothing tonight but a couple of links as I’m currently packing for a company get-away to San Antonio. Blogging this weekend will be unpredictable.

    First and foremost, I’m spending my breaks from packing reading the latest posting from Michael Yon on the ground in Iraq, Gates of Fire. It’s lengthy and, so far and as expected, fascinating. I especially like this early observation:

    Although the situation in Mosul is better, our troops still fight here every day. This may not be the war some folks had in mind a few years ago. But once the shooting starts, a plan is just a guess in a party dress.

    I’d also like to point that the latest installment of the Life, Liberty, Property community‘s Carnival of Liberty is up over at Searchlight Crusade. Go read another fine collection of posts from a libertarian slant.

    Lastly, I wanted to point y’all to a new blogger, the Gunn Nutt. I have to say that I love the “about me” verbage.

    Flag-waiving, gun-toting, unabashed patriot. I love the Constitution, the Founding Fathers and all the members of the U.S. Armed Services. I hate Commies more than broccoli.

    Commies, broccoli … close call. Broccoli hasn’t killed millions, but if gross was fatal ….

    Also, pay attention to the Gunn Nutt’s banner — that tartan is Gunn Modern, and the badge is that of the clan Gunn. The motto Aut Pax Aut Bellum translates to “Either peace or war” and is fitting for the fighting history of the clan. I should say that I’ve grown more partial to the Gunn Ancient version of the tartan, but tastes may vary. I’m looking forward to the Nutt’s blogging next April 6.

  • Six in Calif. Guard to Face Courts-martial

    And the hits just keep on coming for the California National Guard.

    Six members of a California Army National Guard unit will face courts-martial for allegedly mistreating detainees in Iraq, military officials said Tuesday.

    The trials were ordered after investigators reviewed allegations of prisoner abuse by 12 soldiers with the 1st Battalion of the 184th Infantry Regiment.

    Two cases involve a so-called general court-martial, reserved for the most serious infractions, while four involve a midlevel court called a special court-martial, according to Lt. Col. Robert Whetstone, a Task Force Baghdad spokesman.

    Two additional cases have been completed in what is known as a summary court-martial, which hears lesser offenses, but the outcomes were not immediately available, Whetstone said. Four remaining cases were still under investigation, he said.

    The soldiers, who were not identified, belong to the battalion’s Fullerton-based Alpha Company. Some face charges of mistreatment of a person under their control, assault and making a false statement, while one soldier was charged with obstruction of justice, military officials have said.

    “We are confident that the military justice system will address these charges fairly and appropriately, and that a just outcome will be reached,” the guard said in a statement.

    The announcement of these prosecutions comes just on the heels of a brief moment of good news for the Cali Guardsmen.

    I first mentioned this alleged abuse story in this post and its effect on MilBlogger Major K., who rightly pointed out the problem of a few bad apples, in this follow-on post.

    May justice be met, and I have confidence that it will be.

  • Some Fish and a Quagmire

    Sorry, folks, spent the day at the Dallas World Aquarium and still not in blogging mode. Yeah, it’s not the best aquarium, but it’s decent, the best near me and I had not been there yet. For my taste, it focuses too much on birds, monkeys and aquatic reptiles and not enough on fish and sea mammals.

    Oh yeah, about that Iraq terror thing, you’re missing out if you haven’t read about the quagmire yet. Jack Kelly is one of my favorite columnists.

  • Saddam Attacked in Court … or Not

    Saddam’s defense team is making a claim of assault on the former tyrant and underwear model.

    Members of Saddam Hussein’s Jordan-based defence team claimed that the former Iraqi president was attacked during a court appearance last week, a claim immediately disputed by the chief investigating judge of the tribunal.

    A man burst out from those gathered in the court room and tried to hit Saddam as the ousted leader was leaving the courtroom at the end of a 45-minute hearing on Thursday, Saddam’s legal team said in a statement.

    “There was an exchange of blows between the man and the president,” the statement said, also claiming that the judge overseeing the hearing did nothing to stop the assault.

    The U.S. immediately denied that any such event occurred.

    However, a spokeswoman for the US military unit charged with overseeing the custody of prisoners including Saddam, says no such incident took place.

    “Nothing like that happened with Saddam whatsoever,” Lieutenant Kristy Miller said.

    The US military is in charge of Saddam’s physical custody, although he is in Iraqi legal custody.

    Lieutenant Miller says that as far as she knows Saddam almost never leaves US military sight.

    Officials at the Iraqi Special Tribunal, the court set up to try the former president and other senior members of his now defunct Baath Party, were not able to be reached for comment.

    My guess: a ploy by the defense, a delaying tactic that may be the first sign of desperation.

  • Calling All Israeli Video Gamers

    The IDF has a new job for you, as mentioned in this interesting look at the planned Gaza Strip border securities needed for the withdrawal already in motion.

    Israel is increasing security at its border with the Gaza Strip in anticipation of next month’s withdrawal, the army said Thursday, disclosing details of a high-tech complex to ring the coastal strip with what it hopes will be the world’s most impenetrable barrier.

    The barrier system will surround Gaza with fences, electronic sensors, watchtowers mounted with remote-control machine guns, and hundreds of video and night vision cameras, the military said.

    […]

    If they pass this barrier, they would have to traverse a 130-yard swath of land — codenamed Hoover — filled with motion sensors and scanned by an array of day and night optical devices, before reaching the third and newest electronic fence.

    Watchtowers armed with remote-controlled machine guns are to be built every 1.2 miles and within a year, remote-controlled, unmanned vehicles will begin patrolling the area.

    It’s an interesting look at the planned border defenses of a nation that continuously only gets one shot at getting it right — lose and they’re gone, much to the joy of all of their neighbors. Add to that little pressure the threat of Palestinian terrorism and these border defenses must stay as many steps ahead of potential dangers as possible.

  • Today in the War against Islamist Terror

    I have to open with my favorite story of the day.

    Hanoi Jane takes on Iraq war with US bus tour

    Hollywood star and activist Jane Fonda is planning to take a bus tour across America to call for an end to US military operations in Iraq in a move that has already drawn sharp reactions from both the pro- and anti-war camps.

    Ms Fonda, who earned the nickname Hanoi Jane after she was photographed sitting on a north Vietnamese anti-aircraft gun at the height of the Vietnam war, said she would be joined by families of Iraq war veterans and her daughter on the tour.

    “I’ve decided I’m coming out,” she told a cheering audience during an appearance in New Mexico to promote her autobiography, explaining that Iraq veterans had encouraged her to break her silence.

    “I have not taken a stand on any war since Vietnam,” she added. “I carry a lot of baggage from that.”

    Ms Fonda said her anti-war tour in March would use a bus that runs on vegetable oil.

    “I can’t go into any detail except to say that it’s going to be pretty exciting,” she said.

    By exciting, I assume she’s talking about more than the vegetable oil. Look, there is enough to dislike about this woman without erroneous hyperbole, so check the facts of her history.

    It is my opinion that this woman cost lives, both American and our allies. It is apparently her intent to do so again by providing support to the hopes of our enemies. In my view, she has previously committed treason. She seems less intent to do so as blatantly today; I extend to her an invitation to fly over for a photo-op with the beheading terrorists. Perhaps she could feature them in a new exercise DVD. Otherwise, I wish her no success in this latest endeavor but would have no regret for any deserved emotional anguish she may have coming. I truly hope that she suffers no physical harm at the hands of private individuals, but I also don’t want her to enjoy a single welcome reception.

    Truce as French sign up for joint action

    Britain and France called a truce in their disputes over Europe’s future and its financing yesterday to announce fresh co-operation in the fight against terrorism, including sharing the names of “jihadists” living in their countries.

    After talks in Downing Street, Dominique de Villepin, the French Prime Minister, and Tony Blair played down recent disagreements and set out a four-point programme of joint action as a result of the London bombings.

    They agreed that France and Britain would exchange the names of persons in each country who had been trying to incite extremism. They would also retain communications data from telephone calls and e-mails for longer, exchange information about how to protect vulnerable targets and work together to combat the “radicalisation” of the Muslim community.

    Their meeting came as Mr Blair told Muslims in Britain that they had a duty to come forward with information about those involved in terrorist attacks. “My message to anybody who may know of any information about those responsible for last Thursday’s attack is to give that information to the police.

    “There will be people who know information about those that have participated in the attack. The photographs [of the suspects] are pretty strong, good quality has been given. There will be people who know something. It is part of our duty, in order to protect our country, that people come forward and give the police the information they can.”

    I don’t doubt the genuine concern of the French about Islamist terror, as they currently have a sufficient threat of it within their own borders. My continued disdain for the French is greatly stirred by their willingness to impair American efforts, meant for the betterment of survival for the U.S. and all of western culture, to squelch the Islamist movement, just for the sake of France’s own short-term geopolitical gain. President Jacques Chirac’s willingness to enable a continued global threat by opposing U.S. international policy, merely for the purpose of setting up a Franco-led European Union as an alternative global power, has been simply disgusting.

    Egyptians surround villages said to be harboring Sharm bombers

    Egyptian sources say that security forces surrounded two Bedouin villages next to Sharm El-Sheikh on Monday suspected of harboring terrorists responsible for the bombings that killed 88 people last Friday.

    The two suspects reportedly hiding in the villages of Al-Royasat and Hurum are said to be Pakistani nationals.

    According to earlier reports published in the Arab press, the Egyptian police are looking for nine Pakistani citizens that apparently disappeared after the attacks took place, leaving their passports and possessions in the hotel rooms they were staying in.

    The current leadership in Egypt has as much to fear from Islamist terror as does the West and other authoritarian Arab states. The difference is that the West is working to subvert a radical culture; the Arab states are looking to prolong despotic reigns. That is where Iraq provides the hub — a possibly democratic, econically and culturally free, alternative to the typical Arab state is a severe danger to the Islamist movement, but it is also a threat to the existing governments in the region. Is it any wonder that Arab support has been lukewarm at best, behind-the-scenes hostile at worst?

  • Egypt, Beirut: Making London Look Safer

    More terror as bombers strike in Lebanon and wreak havoc in an Egyptian resort. Hey, can’t let the Islamists in England grab all the headlines.

    Beirut blast wounds 12 in busy street

    A bomb exploded near a popular street in Beirut on Friday, wounding 12 people, destroying cars and spraying shards of glass inside crowded restaurants hours after a brief visit by U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice.

    The blast in a Christian neighbourhood of Beirut was the latest to hit Lebanon and came three days after a new government was formed, the first since Syrian forces withdrew in April.

    […]

    Prime Minister Fouad al-Siniora condemned the bombing as he visited the site near Rue Monot, an area known for its nightlife, saying it was “aimed at destabilising Lebanon and shaking the confidence in the new government.”

    Blasts in Egypt Kill at Least 49 at Sinai Resort

    At least 49 people were killed in a series of powerful explosions early Saturday in the Egyptian Red Sea resort of Sharm el Sheik, according to Egyptian state television and wire service reports.

    More than 100 people were wounded in the blasts, apparently caused by car bombs at hotels and a market that catered mostly to European and Arab tourists, the television said. Fire and smoke rose in Sharm el Sheik and nearby Naama Bay, which also has a strip of beach hotels.

    The Egyptian authorities said many of the wounded had severe injuries, and the death toll was expected to rise. Reuters, citing the police, put the death toll at 49.

    Saturday’s bombings appeared to be the deadliest terror attack in Egypt since a 1997 assault in Luxor, on the Nile River, that killed 58 tourists.

    The explosions rocked the resort area shortly after 1 a.m. Saturday and all took place within a few minutes of one another, witnesses said.

    “I heard two blasts and got up and ran out of the hotel,” Yasmine el-Bahey, an Egyptian spending the weekend at the Kahramana Hotel, said in a telephone interview. “Everybody was running outside. Glass was shattered and there was a big cloud of black. Everybody ran to the beach. Many of them were naked.”

    There was no immediate claim of responsibility, and it was not clear whether the bombs were in parked cars or detonated by suicide bombers.

    No immediate claim of responsibility? Well, let me go out on a limb and suspect radical Islamists terrorists. After all, it will be difficult to peg this one on Timothy McVeigh or Charlie Manson.

  • “This changes the face of London”

    Is it possible the 7/7 bombings didn’t get through to some Londoners? Is it really possible that yesterday’s attack was insufficient to make clear the actuality of the war? Apparently so, as there are still some who refuse to face it today, even after a dramatic chase and shooting on the Underground.

    Police Shooting Startles and Worries Londoners

    It was around 10 a.m. on a sunny, summery Friday when London crossed a once-unthinkable line in its unfolding war on terror.

    In a city where most police officers do not carry guns, the shock from the shooting death of a man in a subway car was palpable. It raised questions about police firearms practices, kindled uncertainty among Muslims and deepened the anxiety of a city that looks, these days, under siege.

    The police said they had trailed a man, described as South Asian in appearance, from a house in Stockwell that they had under surveillance. He was clad in bulky clothes on a warm summer day, witnesses said.

    He vaulted over a turnstile and dashed onto a train, with plainclothes police officers right behind him. The police said the man did not obey orders to stop, so the officers shouted at the passengers to get down and take cover.

    The man stumbled onto a train, and a passenger, Mark Whitby, told the BBC: “I looked at his face. He looked sort of left and right, but he basically looked like a cornered rabbit, a cornered fox. He looked absolutely petrified, and then he sort of tripped, but they were hotly pursuing him.”

    The officers “couldn’t have been any more than two or three feet behind him at this time,” Mr. Whitby said, “and he half tripped and was half pushed to the floor, and the policeman nearest to me had the black automatic pistol in his left hand.”

    The officer with the gun “held it down to the guy and unloaded five shots into him,” Mr. Whitby said.

    The gunshots reverberated much further than the grimy confines of Stockwell station, in a hardscrabble neighborhood of south London. It was the first such shooting in memory. Between 1997 and September 2004, the police opened fire on 20 occasions, killing 7 people and wounding 11, according to the Metropolitan Police. The statistics do not specify where the shootings took place.

    Although most London police officers are unarmed, since 9/11 Londoners have grown used to seeing special armed units, who have been given antiterrorism training.

    Police rules require officers to give warning if they intend to open fire and to “ensure that their responses are proportionate and appropriate in the circumstances and consistent with the legitimate objective to be achieved.” Officers are supposed to aim for immobilizing body-shots, but television reports said Friday that shoot-to-kill shots had been authorized to prevent suicide bombings.

    Even as Londoners absorbed the news of the shooting, a debate unfolded whether it was justified.

    Justified? Check the circumstances, check the attire, check the weather. Then ask the Israelis if they have any experience with unusual attire and things going kaboom. Justified? Oh hell yes. Unfortunate? Yes, as well. I’d much rather have this piece of trash in custody spilling his guts than in the Tube spilling his blood. Still, I’ll settle for the blood.

    The article from this point on consists mainly of a back and forth as Londoners chimed in on the developments. I’d like to highlight a few and leave the rest of the article for y’all to peruse. I’ll then turn to a few other pieces of news.
    (more…)