Unfortunately, a tribute meant to pay worthy honor to a life lost is also utilized as an arena for political gain and attack. Equally unfortunate is the fact that there is little surprise to be found in the development.
A day of eulogizing Coretta Scott King turned into a rare, in-person rebuke of President Bush, with a succession of civil rights and political leaders assailing White House policies as evidence that the dream of social and racial equality pursued by King and her slain husband is far from reality.
Bush and his wife, Laura, sat on stage as worshippers cheered the suggestions from several speakers that the civil rights movement — led in the 1960s by the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. and fostered since his assassination by the widowed Coretta — remains alive, its goals not fully realized.
Tuesday’s service, lasting six hours, much of it carried live nationally on cable television, marked an unusual combination of political pageantry and civil rights history. The spectacle included humor, interpretive dance, gospel and classical music, shouting and testifying, and a list of dignitaries that made room for three former presidents, poet Maya Angelou and crooner Michael Bolton.
But it also included pointed political commentary, much of it aimed at Bush. The president and his wife watched as the sanctuary at New Birth Missionary Baptist Church near Atlanta filled with raucous cheers for their White House predecessors, Bill and Hillary Clinton — a reminder that five years into his term, Bush and the Republican Party he leads have not found the acceptance across black America that GOP strategists had hoped.
“This commemorative ceremony this morning and this afternoon is not only to acknowledge the great contributions of Coretta and Martin, but to remind us that the struggle for equal rights is not over,” said former President Carter, a Democrat and former Georgia governor, to rising applause. “We only have to recall the color of the faces of those in Louisiana, Alabama and Mississippi, those who were most devastated by Katrina, to know that there are not yet equal opportunities for all Americans.”
Carter, who has had a strained relationship with Bush, drew cheers when he used the Kings’ struggle as a reminder of the recent debate over whether Bush violated civil liberties protections when he ordered warrantless surveillance of some domestic phone calls and e-mails.
Noting that the Kings’ work was “not appreciated even at the highest level of the government,” Carter said: “It was difficult for them personally — with the civil liberties of both husband and wife violated as they became the target of secret government wiretapping, other surveillance, and as you know, harassment from the FBI.” Bush has said his own program of warrantless wiretapping is aimed at stopping terrorists.
The most overtly partisan remarks came from the Rev. Joseph Lowery, a King protege and longtime Bush critic, who noted Coretta King’s opposition to the war in Iraq and criticized Bush’s commitment to boosting the poor.
“She deplored the terror inflicted by our smart bombs on missions way afar,” he said. “We know now there were no weapons of mass destruction over there. But Coretta knew and we knew that there are weapons of misdirection right down here. Millions without health insurance. Poverty abounds. For war, billions more, but no more for the poor.”
Anybody else reminded of the pep rally … err … funeral for Senator Paul Wellstone? Why is it that such affairs cannot be managed with due dignity and that it is one side of the political spectrum that seems to have a problem managing an actual tribute? If I recall correctly, there were no digs in the direction of Jimmy Carter during the ceremonies as Ronald Reagan was laid to rest.
To his credit, President Bush reportedly carried himself well and in the intended spirit of the occasion.
As the barbs flew, Bush seemed to take the heat in stride, smiling at times, giving Lowery a standing ovation and even pulling the civil rights leader in for a bear hug.
The president himself received polite applause before and after his seven-minute eulogy, in which he said he attended the service “to offer the sympathy of our entire nation at the passing of a woman who worked to make our nation whole.”
“As a great movement of history took shape, her dignity was a daily rebuke to the pettiness and cruelty of segregation,” the president said.
Such is the tone and behaviour memorial services deserve. It would be best for our entire nation to remember and embrace this notion.