Category: Middle East

  • Nationwide Events Being Planned for 2,000 Death

    Disgusting … but not at all surprising.

    The anti-war group American Friends Service Committe is planning hundreds of event across the U.S. to mark the pending passing of the 2,000th death by American service personnel in the Iraqi theater (hat tips to LGF and General Quarters). Details about the events can be found on the AFSC site.

    Soon we’ll be reaching another horrific milestone in the war in Iraq – the death of the 2,000th U.S. service member. AFSC, Military Families Speak Out, Gold Star Families for Peace, and Iraq Veterans Against the War are calling for people across the U.S. to stand up and say that the needless killing of U.S. troops and Iraqis must stop and that the resources funding this war are needed for other things.

    The AFSC is calling for candlelight vigils and public actions. While I disagree with LGF’s characterization of these as parties, I must agree to referring to those participating as ghouls. For those who superficially claim to support the troops, these anti-war elements are quick to jump on any allegation, supported or completely imaginary, against our troops and quite eager to use any nice round casualty figure to their advantage. In short, these people, as a group, sicken me.

    Here is a list of planned event locations, including a dozen sites in Texas. If anyone is interested in a counter-demonstration at a DFW-area location, send me an email. Time is short, as CNN currently shows American military deaths in Iraq at 1,993, as of this writing.

    Meanwhile, Wikipedia currently has the death toll at 2,108, as of this writing, for the one-day battle of Antietam. Oh yeah, that’s just for the Union side. Just a little perspective for ya.

  • Iraqis Nab Alleged Top Terror Financier

    Like father, like son.

    Iraqi police on Wednesday arrested Saddam Hussein’s nephew in Baghdad, charging that he served as the top financier of Iraq’s rampant insurgency, senior Iraqi security officials said.

    Yasir Sabhawi Ibrahim, son of Saddam’s half brother Sabhawi Ibrahim Hasan al-Tikriti, was arrested in a Baghdad apartment, several days after Syrian authorities forced him to return to Iraq, the officials told The Associated Press in a telephone interview from Cairo. They spoke on condition of anonymity because they weren’t authorized to deal with the media.

    One of the officials, who works as a coordinator between Iraqi authorities and U.S. military intelligence, described the purported financier as the most dangerous man in the urgency. The other official, who is a senior member of the Iraqi Defense Ministry, said the arrest was a serious blow to terrorist networks.

    Both officials said Syrian authorities “pushed” Ibrahim into Iraq but did not hand him over to authorities.

    The Syrians were aware of his whereabouts in Baghdad and informed U.S. authorities, who then passed the information to Iraq security forces who carried out a “fast, easy” raid on the fugitive’s apartment, the Defense Ministry official said.

    Chad Evans at In the Bullpen looks at the news as possible good turn in Syrian policy.

    Is this a possible sign Syria may be starting to turn the corner from allowing terrorists and Saddam-linked insurgents to operate freely from their soil? Let us hope.

    Sorry, Chad, but it’s no change from less than eight months ago when, on Feb. 27, the Syrians actually handed over Ibrahim’s daddy to Iraqi authorities. At that time, I harbored the same hope about the Syrians. Nope, they haven’t changed much yet.

  • U.S., Britain, Iran Trade Charges over Attacks

    Bomb attacks hit Iran over the weekend, and Iran responded by pointing an accusing finger at the Brits.

    Yo, Iran: Pot, kettle, black.

    Iran’s president accused Britain on Sunday of being behind deadly weekend bomb attacks in Iran, sharply escalating tension after the United States and Britain charged Iran was involved in insurgent attacks in Iraq.

    “We are very suspicious about the role of British forces in perpetrating such terrorist acts,” the ISNA student news agency quoted Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad as saying of twin bombings that killed five people in southwest Iran on Saturday.

    “Our people are used to these kind of incidents, and our intelligence agents found the footprints of Britain in the same incidents before,” Ahmadinejad said during a cabinet meeting.

    […]

    Britain, which has more than 8,000 troops in southern Iraq, has denied any link with the two bombs in the oil city Ahvaz, which injured more than 80, and with the string of attacks this year in Khuzestan province, the center of Iran’s oil industry.

    No one has claimed responsibility for the homemade bombs, planted in garbage bins and detonated a few minutes apart.

    Ahmadinejad’s remarks raised tension between Tehran and London to new heights. Relations were already sensitive because talks between Iran and Britain, France and Germany on Iran’s controversial nuclear program broke down in August.

    Britain and the United States have accused Iran or the Tehran-backed Lebanese group Hizbollah of providing military expertise to Iraqi insurgents behind attacks on British troops in southern Iraq.

    Iran denies meddling in Iraq and says the accusations against it are psychological warfare tied to efforts by Washington and London to report Tehran to the U.N. Security Council for possible sanctions over its nuclear program.

    Frankly, I wouldn’t be surprised if these attacks were a home-grown problem from a vary sizable portion of the Iranian population growing ever more restless for freedom and democracy. Likewise, I wouldn’t mind a bit if the U.S. or our allies were working to foment any such restlessness.

  • Iraq Constitution Appears Likely to Pass Referendum

    With official returns some days away, signs are already positive the the Iraqi people, who turned out in large numbers to the polls Saturday, will likely approve their constitutional referendum.

    Local election officials in Diyala province say 70 percent of the 400,000 people who voted there in Saturday’s referendum said “yes” to the draft constitution. Twenty-percent rejected it and 10 percent of the ballots were rejected as being irregular.

    Sunni Arabs, who largely reject the constitution because they believe it gives too much power and oil wealth to rival Shi’ites and Kurds, form a majority in Diyala, Salahaddin and Nineveh provinces. But all three provinces have sizable populations of Shi’ites and Kurds, who mostly favor the constitution.

    Without Diyala, Sunni Arabs now have a more difficult task reaching the two-thirds “no” vote in three provinces that would be required to nullify the constitution. That has raised concern that Sunni dissatisfaction over the charter could deepen sectarian and ethnic tension in Iraq, and strengthen the Sunni-led insurgency.

    Sunni Arabs lost power and have felt marginalized since U.S.-led forces deposed Sunni dictator Saddam Hussein. Many Sunnis boycotted elections in January in protest, which brought Iraq’s long-oppressed Shi’ites and Kurds to power.

    Sunnis charge the country’s new powerbrokers drew up the constitution with the intention of ignoring the Sunni people, and looking out only for their own communities. Sunni Arabs say that is a recipe for starting a civil war.

    VOA spoke to about a dozen Sunni Arab residents who took part in Saturday’s vote. Most said that they participated because they regretted boycotting January elections, and needed to feel politically relevant again.

    The heavy turnout gave hope to some that enough Sunni Arabs voted “no” to defeat the constitution. Others said that they voted with the hope that their involvement in the political process will help undercut support for foreign Sunni extremists, like al-Qaida terrorist Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, and bring stability to Iraq.

    […]

    If the constitution passes, Sunni Arabs have a chance to request changes in the charter after elections in December. The challenge of Sunni leaders now is to calm their followers, and focus on generating a huge turnout of voters in December, which will then allow Sunni Arabs to form a political bloc to be reckoned with.

    Once again, the terrorists failed to stop the Iraqis from voting in large numbers and failed to make the streets run with blood. Maybe, just maybe, they’re not the great and popular force that some seem to believe.

    Also, with each election, democracy becomes more ingrained in Iraqi society.

  • Baghdad Blackout Caused by Sabotage

    On the eve of the balloting on their constitutional referendum, many Iraqis are having to endure the night that the lights went out in Baghdad.

    Insurgents sabotaged power lines, knocking out electricity across Baghdad area Friday and plunging the capital into darkness on the eve of a landmark vote on a constitution aimed at defining democracy in a nation once ruled by Saddam Hussein.

    For most of the day, Iraqis were hunkered down in their homes, with the streets of the Iraqi capital almost empty hours before a 10 p.m. curfew and the country sealed off from the outside world as borders and airports were closed for Saturday’s referendum.

    […]

    Although there has been a lull so far this month in major insurgent attacks in Baghdad, the U.S. military has warned of an upsurge in violence to coincide with the vote.

    Mahmoud al-Saaedi, an Electricity Ministry spokesman, said power lines were sabotaged between the northern towns of Kirkuk and Beiji leading to the Baghdad region. He did not specify how insurgents damaged the lines, but militants in the past have used bombs to hit infrastructure.

    The lights went out soon after sundown, when Muslims break their daily fast during the holy month of Ramadan, and power was still off more than two hours later.

    Baghdad’s skyline was black except for pinpoints of light from private generators. The blackout appeared to have affected much of Baghdad province, an area of 2,250 square miles.

    Tens of thousands of Iraqi army troops and policemen, meanwhile, formed security rings around the nation’s estimated 6,000 polling stations and set up checkpoints on highways and inside cities.

    Tomorrow could be a very interesting news day, although it will be some time before results are known.

    As to the referendum, there are two ways in which it could fail to pass.

    Ratification of the constitution requires approval by a majority of voters nationwide.

    However, if two-thirds of voters in any three of Iraq’s 18 provinces vote “no,” the constitution will be defeated and Sunni Arab opponents have a chance of swinging the ballot in four volatile provinces – Anbar, Nineveh, Salahuddin and Diyala.

    Should the constitution be shot down, it would be a blow to the governmental time tables. It should not be considered devastating to our overall goals, though that is how I fully expect our media to trumpet the story.

  • Al-Qaida: US faked al-Zawahiri letter

    There’s no great surprise here, as al Jazeera happily pimps for al Queda and its response to a key intelligence release by the U.S.

    A purported al-Qaida web posting has charged the United States with fabricating a letter in which the group’s No 2 allegedly wrote to its leader in Iraq asking for money and laying out the group’s plans for the Middle East.

    “We in al-Qaida declare that there is no truth to these claims, and they are baseless, except in the imagination of the politicians of the Black (White) House,” according to the statement on a web site known as a clearing house for al-Qaida material.

    The statement was signed by Abu Maysara, who claims to be spokesman for al-Qaida in Iraq. It could not be authenticated.

    “We call on Muslims not to pay attention to this cheap propaganda and to remember that the media will always be the infidels’ sole weapon until the end of the battle,” the statement said.

    Further evidence of U.S. trickery is that Ayman al-Zawahiri always signs his letters to Abu al-Zarqawi with “Hugs and kisses.”

    I put forth my brief analysis of the letter here, but I’d also like to point you towards the Indepundit‘s inciteful look at the revealing communique.

    Kudos also to commenter SPC Richardson for pointing me to CentCom’s examination.

  • Brother, Can You Spare a Dime?

    Nah, but here’s 250 Iraqi dinars, guaranteed by Saddam Hussein himself.

    I’ve blogged before of my old Guard buddy and college friend Bill, both preparing for Iraq and while in the Sandbox. Recently, I mentioned he had mailed me some Saddam-adorned cash. At the request of elgato, seconded by the Gunn Nutt, I’ve scanned in the largest bill, both front and back. Click on the images for bigger versions.

    Front:
    Big Bucks
    Back:
    No Whammies
  • Al Qaeda Letter Called ‘Chilling’

    In your letter you said you didn’t love me
    You said you’re gonna leave me
    But you could’ve said it better
    Oh in your letter, you said you couldn’t face me
    You said you could replace me
    But you could’ve said it better

    —REO Speedwagon

    Well, yes, aspects of a released letter from al Queda’s second-string quarterback Ayman al-Zawahiri to Triple-A Iraq League QB Abu al-Zarqawi indeed could be considered chilling … given the big “if” that the anti-war factions in the West get their way and the U.S. bails before the mission of an established democratic Iraq is actually accomplished.

    Senior U.S. intelligence officials call a letter from al Qaeda’s No. 2 man to its leader in Iraq “chilling” because of how “calm, clear and well argued” it is in urging preparation for a U.S. departure from Iraq.

    According to a translation of the 6,300-word letter provided by the U.S. government, Ayman al-Zawahiri predicts “the Americans will exit soon” from Iraq and says “things may develop faster than we imagine.”

    […]

    The letter outlines a four-stage plan to expand the war in Iraq: Expel U.S. forces, establish an Islamic authority, take the fight to Iraq’s secular neighbors and battle with Israel — “because Israel was established only to challenge any new Islamic entity.”

    The letter says: “We must be ready starting now, before events overtake us, and before we are surprised by the conspiracies of the Americans and the United Nations and their plans to fill the void behind them.”

    First, yes, we are still feeling the repercussions of our tail-between-the-legs withdrawals from Viet Nam and Somalia. The lesson learned by the world and the radical Islamist jihadists in particular: bloody the Americans and they will falter, wilt and betray their own ideals.

    Second, there are no “conspiracies” about what we hope to leave behind us in Iraq. Our plans are quite transparent and disgusting to the radical Islamists — we simply hope to inject a virus into the Middle East and the heart of the sprawling Islamic world. That virus? Liberty and self-determination, the opportunity to build a better life for one’s self and one’s family, notions that are an anathema to we-are-victims-kill-the-oppressors feeding trough from which the Jihadists, and arguably most of the current ruling Arab governments, gather their sustenence.

    That said, there is much hope in this letter, as the Jihadist Zawahiri seems to be almost as concerned about losing the media war as I have been. I still feel that our media has been far too beneficial to our enemy’s cause, but it is interesting to note that the bad guys are concerned about hearts and minds and especially throats. Oh yeah, other Muslim targets also may be problematic for the bastards’ cause.

    “I say to you: that we are in a battle, and that more than half of this battle is taking place in the battlefield of the media,” al-Zawahiri writes.

    “The Muslim populace who love and support you will never find palatable … the scenes of slaughtering the hostages,” he warns al-Zarqawi, self-proclaimed leader of al Qaeda in Iraq.

    Al-Zawahiri also criticizes al-Zarqawi’s attacks on Shiites and reminds him that Shiite Iran is holding more than 100 al Qaeda prisoners — many of them leaders such as Saif al-Adel and Osama bin Laden’s son, Saad.

    “Is the opening of another front now in addition to the front against the Americans and the government a wise decision?” al-Zawahiri asks. “Or does this conflict with Shia lift the burden from the Americans by diverting the mujahedeen to the Shia, while the Americans continue to control matters from afar?”

    The U.S. strongly vouches for the authenticity of the letter, and some have interesting ways of characterizing the document.

    A senior U.S. intelligence official said he was “absolutely confident” the letter is genuine.

    This official described the letter’s language as that of “an al Qaeda elder to an occasionally hotheaded field commander” — language, sources said, that President Bush had seen before he delivered a speech on the war on terror last week.

    “It is cowardice that seeks to kill children and the elderly with car bombs and cuts the throat of a bound captive and targets worshippers leaving a mosque,” President Bush said October 6.

    Nice retort by the president — just the sort of tone to counter current terror tactics in Iraq. I find the elder-field commander analogy interesting. Make no mistake, Zawahiri and Zarqawi ain’t no Eisenhower and Patton. After all, recall any stories of General Patton trying to mooch a few bucks off ol’ Dwight David?

    Dated two days after the London terror attacks of July 7, the letter makes no mention of those attacks and pleads for more information, suggesting al-Zawahiri is feeling cut off.

    He describes difficulties he and al Qaeda are facing more than a dozen times; says the real danger to him comes from Pakistani army operations in the tribal areas; and asks al-Zarqawi whether he could spare a “hundred thousand” dollars.

    We absolutely must stay the course, as the enemy is obviously in disagreement over tactics and disarray over resources.

    Meanwhile, this piece looks at the letter and sees a potentially more ominous note for al Queda.

    There are signs of tension within the al-Qaida leadership, and between them and their followers in Iraq, says a reporter who has followed the movement closely.

    “I think there’s something going on between (al-Qaida leader Osama) bin Laden and (his deputy Ayman al-)Zawahiri. I think Zawahiri is not absolutely happy with what’s going on. I would even go as far as suggesting that maybe Zawahiri doesn’t really know where bin Laden is,” said Yosri Fouda, investigative reporter for the Arabic-language al-Jazeera television network.

    […]

    “He was rather concerned about his own constituency, his own supporters,” commented Foudra of Zawahiri’s letter.

    Others blogging on the letter: Belmont Club, Jawa Report, In the Bullpen.

  • U.S. Uses ‘Iron Fist’ in Iraq

    The U.S. is conducting an offensive against the terrorists in Iraq. I find Canada’s Globe and Mail coverage of the effort to be amazingly negative in story and poor in detail, even for our supposed allies to the north.

    A U.S. offensive aimed at al-Qaeda in Iraq insurgents in western Iraq entered its third day Monday, with air strikes in a town on the banks of the Euphrates River, witnesses said. At least 36 militants have died since the fighting began, officials said.

    No serious U.S. casualties have been reported in the “Iron Fist” offensive by 1,000 Marines, soldiers and sailors near the Syrian border.

    Well, so far, so bland. That must stop. So, too, must actual reporting of the offensive, as the story turns now towards negative news elsewhere in Iraq. Hey, the alleged point of the story got over sixty words — time to shift to unrelated gloom-and-doom.

    In Baghdad, Iraq’s oil minister narrowly survived an assassination attempt when a roadside bomb blasted his seven-car convoy, killing three of his escorts, officials said.

    Elsewhere, roadside bombs and fighting between insurgents and Iraqi forces on Monday wounded at least seven Iraqis in Ramadi, a militant stronghold west of the capital, police and hospital officials said.

    Insurgents wearing black hoods were seen carrying machine guns and rocket-propelled grenades in the city’s streets, and Iraqi civilians gathered around two burning Iraqi army pickup trucks. Some of the civilians celebrated the destruction by carrying Iraqi military helmets and a uniform that appeared to have been pulled from the burning Iraqi vehicles.

    In the northern city of Mosul, a drive-by shooting killed Nafi’a Aziz, a female member of Ninevah’s provincial council, and her son, said police spokesman Brig. Saeed Ahmed. Mr. Aziz was in charge of the council’s human rights committee and a member of the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan, the party of Iraqi President Jalal Talabani.

    The offensive and street fighting come less than two weeks before the national referendum on a new Iraqi constitution. Al-Qaeda in Iraq and other groups in the Sunni-led insurgency have killed at least 207 people over the past eight days in a bid to wreck the vote.

    On Sunday, Al-Qaeda in Iraq claimed to have taken two U.S. Marines captive during the fighting and threatened to kill them within 24 hours unless all female Sunni detainees are released from U.S. and Iraqi prisons in the country. The U.S. military said the claim appeared false but that it was conducting checks “to verify that all Marines are accounted for.”

    Well, that should be enough to quash any optimism about the offensive. Let’s actually return to that offensive, shall we?

    The offensive in western Iraq by 1,000 Marines, soldiers and sailors began early Saturday in the village of Sadah and has since spread to Karabilah and Rumana, two nearby towns on the banks of the Euphrates River. On Monday, witnesses told The Associated Press that helicopter attacks on Rumana were sending up clouds of black smoke.

    No casualties were immediately reported in Monday’s fighting by the witnesses, who spoke on condition of anonymity out of concern for their own safety, or by the U.S. military command center in Baghdad.

    The military says al-Qaeda in Iraq, the country’s most feared insurgent group, has turned the area near Iraq’s border into a “sanctuary” and a way-station for foreign fighters entering from Syria.

    In Karabilah, Marines clashed with insurgents who opened fire from a building on Sunday in a firefight that killed eight militants, the military said.

    Most of the militants appeared to have slipped out of Sadah before the force moved in, and hundreds of the village’s residents fled into Syria ahead of the assault.

    There was “virtually no opposition” in Sadah, the Marine commander in western Anbar province, Col. Stephen W. Davis said.

    At least 28 militants were killed in fighting Sunday, Davis said, bringing the two-day toll among insurgents to 36. There have been no serious U.S. casualties in the operation, he said.

    Okay, the American offensive appears to be going well, time to cast a pall on that.

    On Monday, a CNN journalist embedded with Marines in eastern Karabilah filed video showing the attack. About 20 Iraqi civilians fled the fighting, and the wounded included an Iraqi mother, father and their child, who were bleeding after being hit by flying pieces of concrete.

    Oh holy crap! Civilians in a combat zone were injured by flying bits of building! Oh the humanity! Damn, but large portions of Canada really need wake up, crawl out from under the blanket of protection their southerly neighbors have afforded them for apparently far too long, and actually come face-to-face with a real threat. I doubt their grandfathers on D-Day fretted overly much about bystanders being stung by inadvertant debris.

    The rest of the story ignores the offensive and returns to the negative stories covered earlier. It’s almost like the author wants the reader to know a successful operation is underway, but doesn’t want that news to bring any good vibes. On the other hand, for balance’s sake, the article does wrap up with a slightly positive tidbit, again unrelated to the offensive.

    Elsewhere, Shiite militiamen released the recently kidnapped brother of Iraq’s interior minister, the freed man, Abdul-Jabbar Jabr said.

    Well, there, that’s fair coverage of a friend’s successful venture, wouldn’t you say?

    Meanwhile, Chad over at In the Bullpen has a rather speculative story that al Queda in Iraq may be considering bailing on, well, Iraq as a base of operations. Continued offensives like those barely covered above would certainly play a role in such a maneuver. Chad goes on to ponder about possible new sites for the terrorist base of operations.

    Where would they move? The Sinai is the first place I’d look for any reemergence, but there’s also Northern Africa and the Horn of Africa to consider.

    As I’ve noted before, the U.S. military is already planning for such a relocation.

  • Clash ‘Humiliates’ Palestinian Police

    Gaza moves ever closer to the world of Mad Max, as police react angrily to their own inability to enforce a Palestinian Authority attempt at militant arms control.

    Two dozen policemen last night stormed the Palestinian parliament building, firing in the air to protest against their humiliation by Hamas militants following the worst clash between the factions in a decade.

    This followed running gun battles on Sunday between police and Hamas gunmen in the Gaza Strip, raising fears of a civil war.

    Three people were killed – including Shati refugee camp deputy police commander Ali Makawi – and more than 50 wounded as the Palestinian Authority attempted to enforce its authority by confiscating weapons from Hamas operatives in Gaza.

    The clashes raged for about six hours and subsided only about midnight on Sunday local time, after Egyptian mediators stepped in. It was the fiercest internal fighting since 1996.

    “Yesterday, we did not have enough bullets,” said one of the protesting policemen last night.

    “We had nothing to protect ourselves. Give us at least bullets to protect people and to protect our stations. Our commander died in front of us and we were running out of bullets.”

    The “you can have my AK-47 when you pry it from my cold, dead, Palestinian fingers” reaction by Hamas to the PA effort is, to say the least, unsurprising.

    The clash was triggered when police stopped a car in Gaza City containing four armed Hamas operatives and demanded that they hand over their weapons.

    One of the four was Mohammed Rantisi, the son of the former Hamas leader in Gaza, Abdel Aziz Rantisi, who was assassinated last year by Israel. He refused the demand and when he attempted to drive off the police fired at the car’s tyres.

    Hamas operatives living in the area soon joined in the fight while members of the Fatah movement, headed by PA President Mahmoud Abbas, joined in on the side of the policemen. The fighting spread to other neighbourhoods and the Shati refugee camp, at the edge of Gaza City.

    The clashes came amid the growing tension that followed the PA’s announcement four days earlier that it would no longer allow arms to be carried in the streets by militants. Hamas officials said they had no intention of abiding by that order.

    Ah, the smell of Gaza sans Israeli settlers. It smells like … civil war.

    A senior Hamas official in Damascus, Mohammed Nazel, accused the PA of trying to liquidate Hamas, which is challenging Fatah’s control of the PA by fielding candidates in the coming legislative elections.

    “There is a faction of the Palestinian Authority trying to eradicate Hamas and it plans a widespread conflict in the West Bank,” Mr Nazel said. “The hands of this faction, which is backed by Washington and London, are stained with Palestinian blood, and Hamas will confront it, even at the price of civil war.”

    The PA’s Interior Ministry issued a similarly militant announcement.

    “Hamas bears full responsibility for this crude violation of the law and the games it is playing with Palestinian blood,” it said. “We are determined to enforce the law and no one is above it.”

    For its part, Israel currently seems quite content to sit back and watch the developments, happy for the meantime to not be a target of Palestinian bloodthirst.